From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752749Ab3KXOQY (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:16:24 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:54789 "EHLO mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752382Ab3KXOQW (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:16:22 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 15:15:49 +0100 From: Vladimir Murzin To: Dan Streetman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Seth Jennings , linux-kernel , Bob Liu , Minchan Kim , Weijie Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: change params from hidden to ro Message-ID: <20131124141545.GA2106@hp530> References: <1384965522-5788-1-git-send-email-ddstreet@ieee.org> <20131120173347.GA2369@hp530> <20131122073851.GB1853@hp530> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:18:01PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:52:47PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > On Wed, Nov > > 20, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > > Hi Dan! > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:38:42AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > >> >> The "compressor" and "enabled" params are currently hidden, > >> >> this changes them to read-only, so userspace can tell if > >> >> zswap is enabled or not and see what compressor is in use. > >> > > >> > Could you elaborate more why this pice of information is necessary for > >> > userspace? > >> > >> For anyone interested in zswap, it's handy to be able to tell if it's > >> enabled or not ;-) Technically people can check to see if the zswap > >> debug files are in /sys/kernel/debug/zswap, but I think the actual > >> "enabled" param is more obvious. And the compressor param is really > >> the only way anyone from userspace can see what compressor's being > >> used; that's helpful to know for anyone that might want to be using a > >> non-default compressor. > > > > So, it is needed for user not userspace? I tend to think that users are smart > > enough to check cmdline for that. > > Let's try a different way. Can you explain what the problem is with > making these params user-readable? This patch is absolutely neutral for me - nothing bad and nothing good. I've just been curious what argument for this patch you have except "let it be". Thanks Vadimir