From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754056Ab3KZGGH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:06:07 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:38354 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356Ab3KZGGF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:06:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:05:58 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kent Overstreet Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, snitzer@redhat.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable biovecs Message-ID: <20131126060558.GA6434@infradead.org> References: <20131125215216.GB21515@kmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131125215216.GB21515@kmo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:52:16PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Jens - here's immutable biovecs, rebased and ready for 3.14. Changes since the > last version of the series: Can you do a resend of the patch series to all involved lists first so we can have a detailed look at the current version? > > * bio_clone_bioset() retains the old behaviour, as previously discussed - > bio_clone_fast() is being used by bcache, dm and the new bio_split(). Any chance to have a more descriptive name than bio_clone_fast? Also without having the actual patches in front of me, did you make sure to document the different in semantics in detail? > * refactoring patches to use submit_bio_wait() and bio_for_each_segment() Jens already applied the submit_bio_wait patch.