From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757164Ab3KZOdZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:33:25 -0500 Received: from mail-yh0-f48.google.com ([209.85.213.48]:33037 "EHLO mail-yh0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756897Ab3KZOdW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:33:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:33:13 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: David Ahern Cc: Adrian Hunter , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/25] perf evsel: Skip ignored symbols while printing callchain Message-ID: <20131126143313.GD14838@ghostprotocols.net> References: <1385389075-7989-1-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> <1385389075-7989-22-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> <52947D65.4050405@intel.com> <20131126142002.GC14838@ghostprotocols.net> <5294B06A.60104@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5294B06A.60104@gmail.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:30:02AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > On 11/26/13, 7:20 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >Em Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:52:21PM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > >>On 25/11/13 16:17, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >>>From: David Ahern > >>> } else { > >>>+ if (al.sym->ignore) > >>Seems to segfault here because sym is null > >>>+ return; > >Changed it to look at (al.sym && al.sym->ignore), the rest of the code > >already checkfs if al.sym is NULL (printing [unknown], etc), can you > >please take a look at: > >https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=c0dd57452349779e0e5d436db8f9448dfffcc512 > >In an updated acme/perf/core branch? > Looks good to me. That's what I was going to send you. Sorry for the noise. No problem, I'll regenerate a +perf-core-for-mingo signed tag and send it with this new version with a [PATCH N/M v2] together with a new set of patches that I've put there today, not resending the unmodified patches from last pull req. Is that ok with you Ingo? - Arnaldo