From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932280Ab3KZQTA (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:19:00 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]:58816 "EHLO mail-bk0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932120Ab3KZQS7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:18:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:18:52 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: David Ahern , Adrian Hunter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/25] perf evsel: Skip ignored symbols while printing callchain Message-ID: <20131126161852.GC7775@gmail.com> References: <1385389075-7989-1-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> <1385389075-7989-22-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> <52947D65.4050405@intel.com> <20131126142002.GC14838@ghostprotocols.net> <5294B06A.60104@gmail.com> <20131126143313.GD14838@ghostprotocols.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131126143313.GD14838@ghostprotocols.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:30:02AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu: > > On 11/26/13, 7:20 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > >Em Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:52:21PM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > > >>On 25/11/13 16:17, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > >>>From: David Ahern > > >>> } else { > > >>>+ if (al.sym->ignore) > > > >>Seems to segfault here because sym is null > > > >>>+ return; > > > >Changed it to look at (al.sym && al.sym->ignore), the rest of the code > > >already checkfs if al.sym is NULL (printing [unknown], etc), can you > > >please take a look at: > > > >https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=c0dd57452349779e0e5d436db8f9448dfffcc512 > > > >In an updated acme/perf/core branch? > > > Looks good to me. That's what I was going to send you. Sorry for the noise. > > No problem, I'll regenerate a +perf-core-for-mingo signed tag and > send it with this new version with a [PATCH N/M v2] together with a > new set of patches that I've put there today, not resending the > unmodified patches from last pull req. > > Is that ok with you Ingo? Sounds good to me! Thanks, Ingo