From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753405Ab3K0Ao3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 19:44:29 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:62858 "EHLO mail-pd0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752975Ab3K0AoZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 19:44:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:44:22 -0800 From: Kent Overstreet To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, snitzer@redhat.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable biovecs Message-ID: <20131127004422.GB21305@kmo> References: <20131125215216.GB21515@kmo> <20131126060558.GA6434@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131126060558.GA6434@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:05:58PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:52:16PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > Jens - here's immutable biovecs, rebased and ready for 3.14. Changes since the > > last version of the series: > > Can you do a resend of the patch series to all involved lists first so > we can have a detailed look at the current version? Sure thing. > > * bio_clone_bioset() retains the old behaviour, as previously discussed - > > bio_clone_fast() is being used by bcache, dm and the new bio_split(). > > Any chance to have a more descriptive name than bio_clone_fast? Also > without having the actual patches in front of me, did you make sure to > document the different in semantics in detail? I haven't been able to think of anything I don't hate, I'm open to suggestions.