* [PATCH]mm/vmalloc: interchage the implementation of vmalloc_to_{pfn,page}
@ 2013-11-28 16:29 Jianyu Zhan
2013-11-28 17:41 ` Vladimir Murzin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jianyu Zhan @ 2013-11-28 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: akpm, iamjoonsoo.kim, zhangyanfei, liwanp, rientjes, linux-kernel
Currently we are implementing vmalloc_to_pfn() as a wrapper of
vmalloc_to_page(), which is implemented as follow:
1. walks the page talbes to generates the corresponding pfn,
2. then wraps the pfn to struct page,
3. returns it.
And vmalloc_to_pfn() re-wraps the vmalloc_to_page() to get the pfn.
This seems too circuitous, so this patch reverses the way:
implementing the vmalloc_to_page() as a wrapper of vmalloc_to_pfn().
This makes vmalloc_to_pfn() and vmalloc_to_page() slightly effective.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 0fdf968..a335e21 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -220,12 +220,12 @@ int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
}
/*
- * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps.
+ * Walk a vmap address to the physical pfn it maps to.
*/
-struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
+unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
{
unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) vmalloc_addr;
- struct page *page = NULL;
+ unsigned long pfn;
pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
/*
@@ -244,23 +244,23 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
ptep = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
pte = *ptep;
if (pte_present(pte))
- page = pte_page(pte);
+ pfn = pte_page(pte);
pte_unmap(ptep);
}
}
}
- return page;
+ return pfn;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
/*
- * Map a vmalloc()-space virtual address to the physical page frame number.
+ * Map a vmalloc()-space virtual address to the struct page.
*/
-unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
+struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
{
- return page_to_pfn(vmalloc_to_page(vmalloc_addr));
+ return pfn_to_page(vmalloc_to_pfn(vmalloc_addr));
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
/*** Global kva allocator ***/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]mm/vmalloc: interchage the implementation of vmalloc_to_{pfn,page}
2013-11-28 16:29 [PATCH]mm/vmalloc: interchage the implementation of vmalloc_to_{pfn,page} Jianyu Zhan
@ 2013-11-28 17:41 ` Vladimir Murzin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Murzin @ 2013-11-28 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jianyu Zhan
Cc: linux-mm, akpm, iamjoonsoo.kim, zhangyanfei, liwanp, rientjes,
linux-kernel
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:29:13AM +0800, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> Currently we are implementing vmalloc_to_pfn() as a wrapper of
> vmalloc_to_page(), which is implemented as follow:
>
> 1. walks the page talbes to generates the corresponding pfn,
> 2. then wraps the pfn to struct page,
> 3. returns it.
>
> And vmalloc_to_pfn() re-wraps the vmalloc_to_page() to get the pfn.
>
> This seems too circuitous, so this patch reverses the way:
> implementing the vmalloc_to_page() as a wrapper of vmalloc_to_pfn().
> This makes vmalloc_to_pfn() and vmalloc_to_page() slightly effective.
Any numbers for efficiency?
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 0fdf968..a335e21 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -220,12 +220,12 @@ int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps.
> + * Walk a vmap address to the physical pfn it maps to.
> */
> -struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> +unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> {
> unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) vmalloc_addr;
> - struct page *page = NULL;
> + unsigned long pfn;
uninitialized pfn will lead to a bug.
> pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
>
> /*
> @@ -244,23 +244,23 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> ptep = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
> pte = *ptep;
> if (pte_present(pte))
> - page = pte_page(pte);
> + pfn = pte_page(pte);
page_to_pfn is missed here.
Have you ever tested there is no functional changes?
Vladimir
> pte_unmap(ptep);
> }
> }
> }
> - return page;
> + return pfn;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
>
> /*
> - * Map a vmalloc()-space virtual address to the physical page frame number.
> + * Map a vmalloc()-space virtual address to the struct page.
> */
> -unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> +struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> {
> - return page_to_pfn(vmalloc_to_page(vmalloc_addr));
> + return pfn_to_page(vmalloc_to_pfn(vmalloc_addr));
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
>
>
> /*** Global kva allocator ***/
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]mm/vmalloc: interchage the implementation of vmalloc_to_{pfn,page}
@ 2013-11-28 18:11 Jianyu Zhan
2013-12-01 18:23 ` Vladimir Murzin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jianyu Zhan @ 2013-11-28 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: murzin.v; +Cc: akpm, iamjoonsoo.kim, zhangyanfei, rientjes, linux-kernel
Hi, Vladimir,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Any numbers for efficiency?
>
For the original implementation, vmalloc_to_pfn() wraps the vmalloc_to_page(),
which means
pfn ------> struct page ------> pfn
| |
vmalloc_to_page() vmalloc_to_pfn()
So this patch interchange the implementation, do the dirty page table
walking code in vmalloc_to_pfn(), and then vmalloc_to_page() uses it, the graph
now becomes
pfn ------> struct page
| |
vmalloc_to_pfn() vmalloc_to_page()
>> /*
>> - * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps.
>> + * Walk a vmap address to the physical pfn it maps to.
>> */
>> -struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
>> +unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
>> {
>> unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) vmalloc_addr;
>> - struct page *page = NULL;
>> + unsigned long pfn;
>
> uninitialized pfn will lead to a bug.
>
Why? The coding pratice has mandates we use it after we initialize it,
And if we initialize it , to what value will it promise no bug?
It is unlikely a rubbish initial value will creep in.
>> /*
>> @@ -244,23 +244,23 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
>> ptep = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
>> pte = *ptep;
>> if (pte_present(pte))
>> - page = pte_page(pte);
>> + pfn = pte_page(pte);
>
> page_to_pfn is missed here.
>
> Have you ever tested there is no functional changes?
Oh, gods. My fault. It did has no functional changes.
I just sent the incorrect patch...
it should be
- page = pte_page(pte);
+ pfn = pte_pfn(pte);;
Here is the resent patch:
---
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 0fdf968..e4f0db2 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -220,12 +220,12 @@ int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
}
/*
- * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps.
+ * Walk a vmap address to the physical pfn it maps to.
*/
-struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
+unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
{
unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) vmalloc_addr;
- struct page *page = NULL;
+ unsigned long pfn = 0;
pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
/*
@@ -244,23 +244,23 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
ptep = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
pte = *ptep;
if (pte_present(pte))
- page = pte_page(pte);
+ pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
pte_unmap(ptep);
}
}
}
- return page;
+ return pfn;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
/*
- * Map a vmalloc()-space virtual address to the physical page frame number.
+ * Map a vmalloc()-space virtual address to the struct page.
*/
-unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
+struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
{
- return page_to_pfn(vmalloc_to_page(vmalloc_addr));
+ return pfn_to_page(vmalloc_to_pfn(vmalloc_addr));
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
/*** Global kva allocator ***/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]mm/vmalloc: interchage the implementation of vmalloc_to_{pfn,page}
2013-11-28 18:11 Jianyu Zhan
@ 2013-12-01 18:23 ` Vladimir Murzin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Murzin @ 2013-12-01 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jianyu Zhan; +Cc: akpm, iamjoonsoo.kim, zhangyanfei, rientjes, linux-kernel
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 02:11:14AM +0800, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
>
> Hi, Vladimir,
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Any numbers for efficiency?
> >
>
> For the original implementation, vmalloc_to_pfn() wraps the vmalloc_to_page(),
> which means
>
> pfn ------> struct page ------> pfn
> | |
> vmalloc_to_page() vmalloc_to_pfn()
>
> So this patch interchange the implementation, do the dirty page table
> walking code in vmalloc_to_pfn(), and then vmalloc_to_page() uses it, the graph
> now becomes
>
> pfn ------> struct page
> | |
> vmalloc_to_pfn() vmalloc_to_page()
>
>
> >> /*
> >> - * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps.
> >> + * Walk a vmap address to the physical pfn it maps to.
> >> */
> >> -struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> >> +unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> >> {
> >> unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) vmalloc_addr;
> >> - struct page *page = NULL;
> >> + unsigned long pfn;
> >
> > uninitialized pfn will lead to a bug.
> >
>
> Why? The coding pratice has mandates we use it after we initialize it,
> And if we initialize it , to what value will it promise no bug?
Unless you initialize it conditionally. I bet gcc warned you about this ;)
> It is unlikely a rubbish initial value will creep in.
>
>
> >> /*
> >> @@ -244,23 +244,23 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> >> ptep = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
> >> pte = *ptep;
> >> if (pte_present(pte))
> >> - page = pte_page(pte);
> >> + pfn = pte_page(pte);
> >
> > page_to_pfn is missed here.
> >
> > Have you ever tested there is no functional changes?
>
> Oh, gods. My fault. It did has no functional changes.
>
> I just sent the incorrect patch...
>
> it should be
> - page = pte_page(pte);
> + pfn = pte_pfn(pte);;
>
> Here is the resent patch:
>
I think it is incorrect too. Originally, vmalloc_to_page might return NULL
under some conditions. With your implementation it will return pfn_to_page(0)
which is not the same as NULL.
Vladimir
>
> ---
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 0fdf968..e4f0db2 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -220,12 +220,12 @@ int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps.
> + * Walk a vmap address to the physical pfn it maps to.
> */
> -struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> +unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> {
> unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) vmalloc_addr;
> - struct page *page = NULL;
> + unsigned long pfn = 0;
> pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
>
> /*
> @@ -244,23 +244,23 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> ptep = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
> pte = *ptep;
> if (pte_present(pte))
> - page = pte_page(pte);
> + pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
> pte_unmap(ptep);
> }
> }
> }
> - return page;
> + return pfn;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
>
> /*
> - * Map a vmalloc()-space virtual address to the physical page frame number.
> + * Map a vmalloc()-space virtual address to the struct page.
> */
> -unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> +struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> {
> - return page_to_pfn(vmalloc_to_page(vmalloc_addr));
> + return pfn_to_page(vmalloc_to_pfn(vmalloc_addr));
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
>
>
> /*** Global kva allocator ***/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-01 18:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-28 16:29 [PATCH]mm/vmalloc: interchage the implementation of vmalloc_to_{pfn,page} Jianyu Zhan
2013-11-28 17:41 ` Vladimir Murzin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-28 18:11 Jianyu Zhan
2013-12-01 18:23 ` Vladimir Murzin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox