From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751241Ab3K3JPl (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Nov 2013 04:15:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com ([209.85.160.49]:57081 "EHLO mail-pb0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750979Ab3K3JPg (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Nov 2013 04:15:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:15:31 +0900 From: =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Pinot To: LKML Subject: Update: Evolution of the Linux kernel source code tarball size Message-ID: <20131130091531.GA21999@star.deepsky.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, 2 years ago, I published a graph showing the evolution of the size of the linux kernel tar.bz2 against release count: http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/10/267 I just updated the data and draw the graph. There are now 308 releases (without the 2.6.x.y and the 3.x.y). I predicted last time that 3.19 would break the 100MB symbolic size and it's been confirmed by the new data. You can get the graph on my blog, I provide the data and the gnuplot batch file for graphing/fitting: http://ngc891.blogdns.net/?p=339 Regards, -- Jérôme Pinot http://ngc891.blogdns.net/