From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751826Ab3LALaR (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Dec 2013 06:30:17 -0500 Received: from ring0.de ([91.143.88.219]:39352 "EHLO smtp.ring0.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751447Ab3LALaO (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Dec 2013 06:30:14 -0500 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test: 0-1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. * See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block * for more information. * [URIs: lkml.org] * -0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:30:10 +0100 From: Sebastian Reichel To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Pavel Machek , kernel list Subject: Re: hci_h4p from linux-n900 branch: fix with new bluetooth for 3.13-rc1 Message-ID: <20131201113010.GA9213@earth.universe> Mail-Followup-To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Pavel Machek , kernel list References: <20131127125149.GA9389@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <201311271559.21855@pali> <20131201104839.GC7403@earth.universe> <201312011216.42192@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201312011216.42192@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 12:16:42PM +0100, Pali Roh=E1r wrote: > On Sunday 01 December 2013 11:48:40 Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > While talking about the hci_h4p: What's the status of the > > mainline inclusion? I saw, that you sent it to > > linux-bluetooth guys some time ago. >=20 > Yes, but code needs to be changed... see that thread. I only saw the few small suggestions from [0]. That's why I was wondering about the status. Have there been more mails? -- Sebastian [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/24/375 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSmx3CAAoJENju1/PIO/qaoh4P/jV4T8EOvPM7xcngnYuGT8C1 qnw2BOocwPur+n7Im4RgurJr89nRk5iFL6PDSCzRvgDAvBVk84k5FHJRYTaP4ZUQ EKF8erLpHDpnJVSzdUxG77AoVEHVflR3kK5voI4EKlby2yeVY4NYVRb9XzWASw35 U9J/xXqRKMuqWKB/G48g7BBWKvIZcAde2MCa76AtF8ZHQfaDPby9gxVXkYfOKL8r wvGoqziBikuuBtDAVklTnsw24MirJIemS4eOHwcpiayKyVGzcuRMwT2oHDmwA+iV Q6bXjPi4YJQTrKtbj2RHGAADmw/SyF28BsowZeA/hvZJawBiLLjbZ7bvY5rp4Y83 bQ23aNRDYj92EmUarITUpU9HAlE+Pxdvw+ysKe7AOSussTFWxqQhSSOuSUdUiH5T jXh/oggEVrXpSERHGyo1q9stIBh+cHH+IDT3tt3PqZCwk0ryG9bKhKX9FeIA+t1d Y5FUlyrRHyRxICfPoBSDIz8e57lfXU852WiUuvQd57/UqIukmnpjPOAEPp8/4ZlR CXtH3n+RFTmydCPr7TWpPgxmaOcst5vteliCXKXIVXqKS8m2J82NFkqhPfPySAaO DONBA6d7bsGsbtbCxfoJ4hMsvTqXmkYSjrYE7LFOjRFb82gzMT09tWp+df6GgBP+ 4xGzG+LXtaff/Uzh+4qZ =zKx1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--