public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:33:47 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131202123347.GD2371@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385967199-3759-4-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>

Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
> 
> The --show-time-info option is for displaying elapsed sampling time

Isn't that too long? Can't we use just --time/-t?

> information for each entry.
> 
>   $ perf record -- perf bench sched messaging
>   $ perf report --stdio --show-time-info
>   ...
>   # Samples: 10K of event 'cycles'
>   # Event count (approx.): 5118793536
>   # Total sampling time  : 0.184277 (sec)
>   #
>   # Overhead        Time          Command      Shared Object                       Symbol
>   # ........  ..........  ...............  .................  ...........................
>   #
>        7.26%    0.007413  sched-messaging  [unknown]          [.] 0x0000003153e7a6e7
>        4.79%    0.006088  sched-messaging  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] avc_has_perm_flags
>        4.38%    0.004809  sched-messaging  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] copy_user_generic_string
>        3.81%    0.005457  sched-messaging  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] _raw_spin_lock
>        2.92%    0.002745  sched-messaging  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>        2.72%    0.002896  sched-messaging  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] unix_stream_recvmsg
>        2.55%    0.003745  sched-messaging  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __slab_free
>        2.45%    0.002807  sched-messaging  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] page_fault
>        2.08%    0.002258  sched-messaging  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sock_has_perm
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-report.c |  2 ++
>  tools/perf/ui/hist.c        | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  tools/perf/util/hist.h      |  1 +
>  tools/perf/util/symbol.h    |  3 +-
>  4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> index eb849e9f7093..345cce6f5fa2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> @@ -898,6 +898,8 @@ int cmd_report(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>  	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "mem-mode", &report.mem_mode, "mem access profile"),
>  	OPT_CALLBACK(0, "percent-limit", &report, "percent",
>  		     "Don't show entries under that percent", parse_percent_limit),
> +	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "show-time-info", &symbol_conf.show_time_info,
> +		    "Show a column with the elapsed time"),
>  	OPT_END()
>  	};
>  	struct perf_data_file file = {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> index 78f4c92e9b73..7cf584a0bb61 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> @@ -7,19 +7,24 @@
>  #include "../util/evsel.h"
>  
>  /* hist period print (hpp) functions */
> +enum hpp_fmt_type {
> +	HPP_FMT__PERCENT,
> +	HPP_FMT__RAW,
> +	HPP_FMT__TIME,
> +};

I wonder if we can't make this a bitmask... Does it make sense to print
both percent and time, for instance?
  
>  typedef int (*hpp_snprint_fn)(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt, ...);
>  
>  static int __hpp__fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
>  		      u64 (*get_field)(struct hist_entry *),
>  		      const char *fmt, hpp_snprint_fn print_fn,
> -		      bool fmt_percent)
> +		      enum hpp_fmt_type type)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct hists *hists = he->hists;
>  	struct perf_evsel *evsel = hists_to_evsel(hists);
>  
> -	if (fmt_percent) {
> +	if (type == HPP_FMT__PERCENT) {
>  		double percent = 0.0;
>  
>  		if (hists->stats.total_period)
> @@ -27,8 +32,15 @@ static int __hpp__fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
>  				  hists->stats.total_period;
>  
>  		ret = print_fn(hpp->buf, hpp->size, fmt, percent);
> -	} else
> +	} else if (type == HPP_FMT__RAW) {
>  		ret = print_fn(hpp->buf, hpp->size, fmt, get_field(he));
> +	} else if (type == HPP_FMT__TIME) {
> +		u64 time = get_field(he);
> +		u64 sec = time / NSEC_PER_SEC;
> +		u64 usec = (time - sec * NSEC_PER_SEC) / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +
> +		ret = print_fn(hpp->buf, hpp->size, fmt, sec, usec);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (perf_evsel__is_group_event(evsel)) {
>  		int prev_idx, idx_delta;
> @@ -53,15 +65,22 @@ static int __hpp__fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
>  				 * have no sample
>  				 */
>  				ret += print_fn(hpp->buf + ret, hpp->size - ret,
> -						fmt, 0);
> +						fmt, 0, 0);
>  			}
>  
> -			if (fmt_percent)
> +			if (type == HPP_FMT__PERCENT)
>  				ret += print_fn(hpp->buf + ret, hpp->size - ret,
>  						fmt, 100.0 * period / total);
> -			else
> +			else if (type == HPP_FMT__RAW)
>  				ret += print_fn(hpp->buf + ret, hpp->size - ret,
>  						fmt, period);
> +			else if (type == HPP_FMT__TIME) {
> +				u64 sec = period / NSEC_PER_SEC;
> +				u64 usec = (period - sec * NSEC_PER_SEC) / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +
> +				ret += print_fn(hpp->buf + ret, hpp->size - ret,
> +						fmt, sec, usec);
> +			}
>  
>  			prev_idx = perf_evsel__group_idx(evsel);
>  		}
> @@ -73,7 +92,7 @@ static int __hpp__fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
>  			 * zero-fill group members at last which have no sample
>  			 */
>  			ret += print_fn(hpp->buf + ret, hpp->size - ret,
> -					fmt, 0);
> +					fmt, 0, 0);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	return ret;
> @@ -117,7 +136,7 @@ static int hpp__color_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,		\
>  			      struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he) 	\
>  {										\
>  	return __hpp__fmt(hpp, he, he_get_##_field, " %6.2f%%",			\
> -			  percent_color_snprintf, true);			\
> +			  percent_color_snprintf, HPP_FMT__PERCENT);		\
>  }
>  
>  #define __HPP_ENTRY_PERCENT_FN(_type, _field)					\
> @@ -126,7 +145,7 @@ static int hpp__entry_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *_fmt __maybe_unused,		\
>  {										\
>  	const char *fmt = symbol_conf.field_sep ? " %.2f" : " %6.2f%%";		\
>  	return __hpp__fmt(hpp, he, he_get_##_field, fmt,			\
> -			  scnprintf, true);					\
> +			  scnprintf, HPP_FMT__PERCENT);				\
>  }
>  
>  #define __HPP_ENTRY_RAW_FN(_type, _field)					\
> @@ -139,7 +158,23 @@ static int hpp__entry_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *_fmt __maybe_unused,		\
>  			      struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he) 	\
>  {										\
>  	const char *fmt = symbol_conf.field_sep ? " %"PRIu64 : " %11"PRIu64;	\
> -	return __hpp__fmt(hpp, he, he_get_raw_##_field, fmt, scnprintf, false);	\
> +	return __hpp__fmt(hpp, he, he_get_raw_##_field, fmt, scnprintf,		\
> +			  HPP_FMT__RAW);					\
> +}
> +
> +#define __HPP_ENTRY_TIME_FN(_type, _field)					\
> +static u64 he_get_raw_##_field(struct hist_entry *he)				\
> +{										\
> +	return he->stat._field;							\
> +}										\
> +										\
> +static int hpp__entry_##_type(struct perf_hpp_fmt *_fmt __maybe_unused,		\
> +			      struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he) 	\
> +{										\
> +	const char *fmt = symbol_conf.field_sep ? " %"PRIu64 ".%06"PRIu64 : 	\
> +						  " %2"PRIu64 ".%06"PRIu64;	\
> +	return __hpp__fmt(hpp, he, he_get_raw_##_field, fmt, scnprintf,		\
> +			  HPP_FMT__TIME);					\
>  }
>  
>  #define HPP_PERCENT_FNS(_type, _str, _field, _min_width, _unit_width)	\
> @@ -153,6 +188,11 @@ __HPP_HEADER_FN(_type, _str, _min_width, _unit_width)			\
>  __HPP_WIDTH_FN(_type, _min_width, _unit_width)				\
>  __HPP_ENTRY_RAW_FN(_type, _field)
>  
> +#define HPP_TIME_FNS(_type, _str, _field, _min_width, _unit_width)	\
> +__HPP_HEADER_FN(_type, _str, _min_width, _unit_width)			\
> +__HPP_WIDTH_FN(_type, _min_width, _unit_width)				\
> +__HPP_ENTRY_TIME_FN(_type, _field)
> +
>  
>  HPP_PERCENT_FNS(overhead, "Overhead", period, 8, 8)
>  HPP_PERCENT_FNS(overhead_sys, "sys", period_sys, 8, 8)
> @@ -163,6 +203,8 @@ HPP_PERCENT_FNS(overhead_guest_us, "guest usr", period_guest_us, 9, 8)
>  HPP_RAW_FNS(samples, "Samples", nr_events, 12, 12)
>  HPP_RAW_FNS(period, "Period", period, 12, 12)
>  
> +HPP_TIME_FNS(time, "Time", time, 10, 10)
> +
>  #define HPP__COLOR_PRINT_FNS(_name)			\
>  	{						\
>  		.header	= hpp__header_ ## _name,	\
> @@ -185,7 +227,8 @@ struct perf_hpp_fmt perf_hpp__format[] = {
>  	HPP__COLOR_PRINT_FNS(overhead_guest_sys),
>  	HPP__COLOR_PRINT_FNS(overhead_guest_us),
>  	HPP__PRINT_FNS(samples),
> -	HPP__PRINT_FNS(period)
> +	HPP__PRINT_FNS(period),
> +	HPP__PRINT_FNS(time)
>  };
>  
>  LIST_HEAD(perf_hpp__list);
> @@ -223,6 +266,9 @@ void perf_hpp__init(void)
>  
>  	if (symbol_conf.show_total_period)
>  		perf_hpp__column_enable(PERF_HPP__PERIOD);
> +
> +	if (symbol_conf.show_time_info)
> +		perf_hpp__column_enable(PERF_HPP__TIME);
>  }
>  
>  void perf_hpp__column_register(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> index 0433469812dc..17e89fb31db9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ enum {
>  	PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD_GUEST_US,
>  	PERF_HPP__SAMPLES,
>  	PERF_HPP__PERIOD,
> +	PERF_HPP__TIME,
>  
>  	PERF_HPP__MAX_INDEX
>  };
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> index f1031a1358a1..b29d26222c6f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ struct symbol_conf {
>  			annotate_asm_raw,
>  			annotate_src,
>  			event_group,
> -			demangle;
> +			demangle,
> +			show_time_info;
>  	const char	*vmlinux_name,
>  			*kallsyms_name,
>  			*source_prefix,
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-02 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-02  6:53 [RFC 0/3] perf tools: Show time info (v1) Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02  6:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Record total sampling time Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 12:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-02 12:57     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-02 15:43       ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 16:36         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-02 20:24           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-03  5:44             ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-03 14:30               ` David Ahern
2013-12-04 10:00                 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-04 10:02             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-03  5:33           ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 15:05     ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 18:51       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02  6:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Record sampling time for each entry Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 12:39   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 14:57     ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 18:49       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-03  4:33         ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02  6:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 12:33   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2013-12-02 14:38     ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02  9:35 ` [RFC 0/3] perf tools: Show time info (v1) Pekka Enberg
2013-12-03  2:28   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 17:04 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-03  2:34   ` Namhyung Kim
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-02 19:23 [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 19:25 ` David Ahern
2013-12-02 19:38   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 19:58     ` David Ahern
2013-12-02 20:17       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 20:22         ` David Ahern
2013-12-04 10:11         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-04 12:57           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131202123347.GD2371@ghostprotocols.net \
    --to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox