From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752982Ab3LBOjn (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:39:43 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:43315 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752951Ab3LBOji (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:39:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:39:34 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Ingo Molnar Cc: LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Rostedt , Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dynticks updates for 3.13 Message-ID: <20131202143927.GB6758@localhost.localdomain> References: <1384181387-30194-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20131130135907.GA19027@gmail.com> <20131130141106.GA19997@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20131130141106.GA19997@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 03:11:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > Ingo, > > > > > > Please pull the timers/core branch that can be found at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git > > > timers/core > > > > > > It passed through 0-day testing. I'm proposing it for 3.13 just in case but I'm ok > > > as well if you think it's too late and should be delayed for 3.14 > > > > Pulled into tip:timers/core, thanks Frederic! > > Hm, I had to unpull it due to build failure: > > kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1054:2: error: too few arguments to function ‘tick_check_nohz’ Aie! I realize now that Wu Fengguang's 0-day testing reported me this on the 1st version of this patchset. Then I got distracted with other things and forgot to fix it. And it didn't warn me on the 2nd take to avoid spamming me. Anyway, I'll fix this and resend. > > I guess this means that it's better to rebase this series - at which > point the other complaints I had could be addressed as well? Yeah sure. Thanks! > > Thanks, > > Ingo