From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753273Ab3LCB1O (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 20:27:14 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43877 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751935Ab3LCB1M (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 20:27:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:27:11 -0800 From: "'Greg Kroah-Hartman'" To: Jingoo Han Cc: "'Joe Perches'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Bjorn Helgaas'" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 38/39] PCI: remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro Message-ID: <20131203012711.GA32730@kroah.com> References: <001501ceefb1$69c96820$3d5c3860$%han@samsung.com> <003b01ceefb6$bca43ed0$35ecbc70$%han@samsung.com> <1386028330.15309.13.camel@joe-AO722> <003e01ceefc5$1a6f9880$4f4ec980$%han@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003e01ceefc5$1a6f9880$4f4ec980$%han@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:15:06AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Tuesday, December 03, 2013 8:52 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 08:32 +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > > > Don't use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro, because this macro > > > is not preferred. Also, the definition of DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE > > > macro is removed. > > > > These sorts of treewide conversions are almost never > > applied wholesale. > > > > This patch is not appropriate until there are no more > > uses of DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE in Linus' tree. > > > > Just marking the function as deprecated in the > > documentation and the pci.h file is probably good > > enough for now. > > > > see: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/2/400 > > Actually, I want to remove all DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLEs from the > next 3.14-rc1 kernel, by merging all patches through Greg's tree. > > Greg, > How about you? No, take them through their individual driver trees please. thanks, greg k-h