linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] ACPI/platform: Add ACPI ID for Intel MBI device
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:44:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131204024452.GB8282@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131204022130.GA26084@srcf.ucam.org>

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:21:30AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 06:17:03PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > This is per the requirement in Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt:
> > 
> > "Currently the kernel is not able to automatically determine from which ACPI
> > device it should make the corresponding platform device so we need to add
> > the ACPI device explicitly to acpi_platform_device_ids list defined in
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c"
> 
> Well sure, but why do you need to be a platform device at all? This 
> functionality was intended for cases where we already have a driver for 
> the part that enumerated it via some other mechanism. If the driver's 
> only intended for ACPI systems then why not just be an ACPI device?
> 

It was my understanding that with ACPI 5.0 it was becoming more common to use
ACPI ID's exclusively for device enumeration. I originally wrote this as an
acpi_bus driver but Rafeal advised me that the model is being phased out and
suggeted the platform model instead.

> -- 
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-04  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-22  6:05 [PATCH 1/2] New Driver for IOSF-SB MBI access on Intel SOCs David E. Box
2013-11-22  6:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / platform: Add ACPI ID for Intel IOSF-SB David E. Box
2013-11-22 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] New Driver for IOSF-SB MBI access on Intel SOCs Matthew Garrett
2013-11-24  0:41 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-03 23:59 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] New driver for Intel IOSF MBI access David E. Box
2013-12-03 23:59   ` [PATCHv2 1/2] New Driver for IOSF-SB MBI access on Intel SOCs David E. Box
2013-12-04  6:44     ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-03 23:59   ` [PATCHv2 2/2] ACPI/platform: Add ACPI ID for Intel MBI device David E. Box
2013-12-04  1:30     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04  2:17       ` David E. Box
2013-12-04  2:21         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04  2:44           ` David E. Box [this message]
2013-12-04  2:54             ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04 21:34               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-05 20:01   ` [PATCH] X86 platform: New IOSF-SB MBI driver for Intel SOCs David E. Box
2013-12-05 22:32     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-06 20:59   ` [PATCH] X86 platform: New BayTrail IOSF-SB MBI driver David E. Box
2013-12-07  1:29     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-10  1:11       ` David E. Box
2013-12-19 22:37     ` [PATCH v5][RESEND] " David E. Box
2013-12-20  1:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-20  7:01         ` David E. Box
2013-12-30 18:12       ` [PATCH v6] " David E. Box
2014-01-07 18:03         ` [PATCH v6][RESEND] platform: x86: " David E. Box
2014-01-07 18:15           ` Randy Dunlap
2014-01-07 18:48             ` David E. Box
2014-01-07 19:30               ` Randy Dunlap
2014-01-07 20:46               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-07 21:43                 ` David E. Box
2014-01-08  0:11                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-08  0:00                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-08  5:27                     ` David E. Box
2014-01-08 13:47                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-08 21:27       ` [PATCH v7] arch: x86: New MailBox support driver for Intel SOC's David E. Box
2014-01-10 22:10         ` [tip:x86/platform] " tip-bot for David E. Box

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131204024452.GB8282@linux.intel.com \
    --to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).