From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Record total sampling time
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:02:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131204100221.GB2363@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131202202459.GF17149@ghostprotocols.net>
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> wrote:
> Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > 2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
> > > > So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
> > > > following behavior:
>
> > > > perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
>
> > > > perf report stat # Reports as if we ran: 'perf stat -a -e cycles sleep 1'
> > > > perf report # Reports the usual histogram
>
> > > > perf report --stat # Reports the perf stat output and the histogram
>
> > > > or so.
>
> > > I don't think we need both of 'perf report stat' and 'perf report
> > > --stat'. At least it looks somewhat confusing to users IMHO.
>
> > Okay. Maybe the --stat option would be the more logical choice,
> > because '--' options can be added arbitrarily, while it would be weird
> > to add multiple subcommand options.
>
> > So basically there would be two options:
>
> > --show-stat [--no-show-stat]
> > --show-histogram [--no-show-histogram]
>
> > Today --show-histogram is the only one enabled by default.
>
> > Running:
>
> > perf report --no-show-histogram --show-stat
>
> Why not:
>
> perf stat -i perf.data
>
> and make it be an optional argument, so plain:
>
> perf stat -i
>
> would process perf.data, i.e. would get the samples, accrue the periods,
> calculate the time, etc and then present it as 'perf stat <some
> target>'.
>
> Right now 'perf stat -i' i used for '--no-inherit', perhaps we can just
> have --no-inherit have no short option and grab -i to have the same
> meaning as in 'report', 'script', etc.
Sounds good to me! It's (much) better than complicating the perf
report UI with non-histogram formatting. perf record would have to be
enhanced to make sure all events are 'perf stat' extractable by
default, but that's it I think.
The only downside is that I now cannot get Namhyung to implement this
nice feature as a side effect of the perf report feature he wants ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-04 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 6:53 [RFC 0/3] perf tools: Show time info (v1) Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 6:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Record total sampling time Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-02 12:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-02 15:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 16:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-02 20:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-03 5:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-03 14:30 ` David Ahern
2013-12-04 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-04 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-12-03 5:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 15:05 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 18:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 6:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Record sampling time for each entry Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 12:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 14:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 18:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-03 4:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 6:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 12:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 14:38 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 9:35 ` [RFC 0/3] perf tools: Show time info (v1) Pekka Enberg
2013-12-03 2:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 17:04 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-03 2:34 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131204100221.GB2363@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@iki.fi \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox