From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:12:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131204151213.GW10036@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131204090814.GA32218@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:08:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods
>
> I guess v2 is a reaction to my review feedback? I got no reply to my
> mail from you so I'm not sure and I'd like to know whether all
> feedback was addressed.
Actually this was mostly insipired by a private mail from hpa. I forgot
to reply to your mail, sorry about that.
But anyways, I think apart from your comment about the KB/MB macros,
the rest of the comments no longer apply. And as far as those macros
go, there seem to be similar macros already sprinkled around in various
places, so I'm not sure how big of a fallout we'd have if I just stick
them into kernel.h.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-04 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1386085793-317-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
2013-12-03 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Add vfunc for Intel graphics stolen memory base address ville.syrjala
2013-12-03 15:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms ville.syrjala
2013-12-04 9:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-04 15:12 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2013-12-04 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-07 15:28 ` [PATCH v3 " ville.syrjala
2014-02-04 12:47 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-02-04 13:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-02-05 5:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-03 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: Print the Intel graphcis stolen memory range ville.syrjala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131204151213.GW10036@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox