public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Ben Zhang <benzh@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Add a sysctl to disable soft lockup detector
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:29:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131204212916.GJ35219@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386107674-15903-1-git-send-email-benzh@chromium.org>

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:54:34PM -0800, Ben Zhang wrote:
> This provides usermode a way to disable only the soft
> lockup detector while keeping the hard lockup detector
> running.
> 
> kernel.softlockup_detector_enable=1:
> This is the default. The soft lockup detector is enabled.
> When a soft lockup is detected, a warning message with
> debug info is printed. The kernel may be configured to
> panics in this case via the sysctl kernel.softlockup_panic.
> 
> kernel.softlockup_detector_enable=0:
> The soft lockup detector is disabled. Warning message is
> not printed on soft lockup. The kernel does not panic on
> soft lockup regardless of the value of kernel.softlockup_panic.
> Note kernel.softlockup_detector_enable does not affect
> the hard lockup detector.

As Andrew said, I wouldn't mind see an explaination for the need.

The softlockup was designed to be always running when the hardlockup
detector was running (though this patch is cute way to work around that).

So your patch disables the check but not the overhead.  I am not sure if
that would confuse an end user or not.

Cheers,
Don

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Zhang <benzh@chromium.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h |  1 +
>  kernel/sysctl.c       |  9 +++++++++
>  kernel/watchdog.c     | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 768b037..93ebec4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ extern int proc_dowatchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  				  void __user *buffer,
>  				  size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
>  extern unsigned int  softlockup_panic;
> +extern unsigned int  softlockup_detector_enable;
>  void lockup_detector_init(void);
>  #else
>  static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 34a6047..8ae1f36 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -840,6 +840,15 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
>  		.extra2		= &one,
>  	},
>  	{
> +		.procname	= "softlockup_detector_enable",
> +		.data		= &softlockup_detector_enable,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
> +		.extra1		= &zero,
> +		.extra2		= &one,
> +	},
> +	{
>  		.procname       = "nmi_watchdog",
>  		.data           = &watchdog_user_enabled,
>  		.maxlen         = sizeof (int),
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 4431610..b9594e6 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,18 @@ static int __init softlockup_panic_setup(char *str)
>  }
>  __setup("softlockup_panic=", softlockup_panic_setup);
>  
> +unsigned int __read_mostly softlockup_detector_enable = 1;
> +
> +static int __init softlockup_detector_enable_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +	unsigned long res;
> +	if (kstrtoul(str, 0, &res))
> +		res = 1;
> +	softlockup_detector_enable = res;
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("softlockup_detector_enable=", softlockup_detector_enable_setup);
> +
>  static int __init nowatchdog_setup(char *str)
>  {
>  	watchdog_user_enabled = 0;
> @@ -293,6 +305,9 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
>  		return HRTIMER_RESTART;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!softlockup_detector_enable)
> +		return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> +
>  	/* check for a softlockup
>  	 * This is done by making sure a high priority task is
>  	 * being scheduled.  The task touches the watchdog to
> -- 
> 1.8.4.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-04 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-03 21:54 [PATCH] watchdog: Add a sysctl to disable soft lockup detector Ben Zhang
2013-12-03 22:27 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-04 21:29 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2013-12-05  1:55   ` [PATCH v2] " Ben Zhang
2013-12-05  3:12     ` Don Zickus
2013-12-05 20:42       ` [PATCH] watchdog: touch_nmi_watchdog should only touch local cpu not every one Ben Zhang
2013-12-16 15:55         ` Don Zickus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131204212916.GJ35219@redhat.com \
    --to=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benzh@chromium.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox