From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
To: "Cortes, Alexis" <alexis.cortes@ti.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Use correct reset for wedged USB3 devices that are NOTATTACHED
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:04:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131205000409.GA10678@xanatos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31F406F20B26204E8066CA524505279A269C6840@DFLE12.ent.ti.com>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:53:22PM +0000, Cortes, Alexis wrote:
> Hi Sarah,
>
> Sorry for my delayed response, I just saw your e-mail (it got filtered somehow). About your question: actually I'm not sure, I'll have to check that to confirm it. I'll get back to you with an answer as soon as I have it.
Ping, Alexis: any info on this question?
Sarah Sharp
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:31 PM
> To: Alan Stern
> Cc: Julius Werner; Greg Kroah-Hartman; LKML; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; Benson Leung; Vincent Palatin; Cortes, Alexis
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Use correct reset for wedged USB3 devices that are NOTATTACHED
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:32:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Julius Werner wrote:
> >
> > > > What if the device is in USB_STATE_SUSPENDED?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure that is possible at that point in hub_events(), I don't
> > > know of a way that could lead to this situation. I could still add
> > > the check just to be sure if you want it, though.
> >
> > I don't know either. But Sarah has said that ports can spontaneously
> > go into Compliance Mode for no apparent reason. If that can happen,
> > maybe it can happen while the port is in U3 and the device is
> > suspended. In such cases, though, you'd need to do a reset-resume
> > rather than a simple reset.
>
> Looking at commits c3897aa5386faba77e5bbdf94902a1658d3a5b11 and 71c731a296f1b08a3724bd1b514b64f1bda87a23, it seems that the TI host controllers' ports can go into compliance mode only when a device is inserted. Once the device is link trained by the redriver, the port shouldn't go into compliance mode. So we should never see compliance mode on a port with an attached USB device in suspend.
>
> Alex, can you confirm that the TI host's port won't go into compliance mode while a connected device is suspended?
>
> > > > Not at all. If a device is unplugged, its state changes to
> > > > NOTATTACHED before the driver is unbound. During that time, the
> > > > driver will see all its URBs failing, so it may very well try to reset the device.
> > > > (For example, usbhid behaves like this.) That isn't a bug.
> > >
> > > Oh, okay, I wasn't quite sure how that plays together. Would you
> > > think it's still valuable to print it out (maybe as dev_info()
> > > instead of
> > > dev_warn()) instead of just silently ignoring the reset request? It
> > > would have certainly been useful for me to find this problem faster,
> > > but I can take it out again if you think it would result in too much
> > > noise.
> >
> > I think keeping dev_dbg() is best. If you're searching for the
> > solution to a problem, you should have debugging enabled and so you
> > ought to see the message.
> >
> > Alan Stern
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-05 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 20:27 [PATCH] usb: hub: Use correct reset for wedged USB3 devices that are NOTATTACHED Julius Werner
2013-11-06 20:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-11-06 21:52 ` Alan Stern
2013-11-06 22:41 ` Julius Werner
2013-11-07 15:32 ` Alan Stern
2013-11-07 18:51 ` Julius Werner
2013-11-07 18:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Julius Werner
2013-11-08 16:58 ` Alan Stern
2013-11-14 23:30 ` [PATCH] " Sarah Sharp
2013-11-18 19:08 ` Julius Werner
2013-11-19 14:53 ` Cortes, Alexis
2013-12-05 0:04 ` Sarah Sharp [this message]
2013-12-05 16:50 ` Cortes, Alexis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131205000409.GA10678@xanatos \
--to=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexis.cortes@ti.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=vpalatin@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox