From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932719Ab3LEPmk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:42:40 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44565 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932223Ab3LEPmd (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:42:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:43:40 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: ZHAO Gang Cc: Jingoo Han , STAGING SUBSYSTEM , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/39] vme: remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro Message-ID: <20131205154340.GA7460@kroah.com> References: <001501ceefb1$69c96820$3d5c3860$%han@samsung.com> <003701ceefb6$64918db0$2db4a910$%han@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:14:37PM +0800, ZHAO Gang wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > > Don't use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro, because this macro > > is not preferred. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han > > --- > > Greg, this patch should be reverted. It do the opposite things. Not at all, it is correct.