From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756760Ab3LFAGO (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:06:14 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49215 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756081Ab3LFAGL (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:06:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:06:10 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Adrien =?iso-8859-1?Q?Verg=E9?= Cc: Christopher Covington , Russell King , Randy Dunlap , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks , Andrew Morton , Dietmar Eggemann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "zhangwei(Jovi)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM Coresight: Enhance ETM tracing control Message-ID: <20131206000610.GA30344@kroah.com> References: <20131204170703.GA14859@kroah.com> <20131204230239.GB9205@kroah.com> <20131205040104.GA14641@kroah.com> <52A0DE42.3080602@codeaurora.org> <20131205201659.GA14539@kroah.com> <52A101F8.3060104@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 06:54:49PM -0500, Adrien Vergé wrote: > > Well, these patches were incorrect, so that's not really a valid > > question :) > > Should I correct the pid size and send them again? I'm not the ARM maintainer, so I can't say if I would reject them or not. And I don't know if you can fix up the pid issue due to namespaces, how are you going to specify the namespace of the pid you are interested in? Oh, and someone should fix up the sysfs files no matter what, they shouldn't be using "raw" kobjects, but that's not your issue. I can send a patch to do that after your additions go in if needed. thanks, greg k-h