From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758238Ab3LFOnm (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:43:42 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:21261 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753980Ab3LFOnl (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:43:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:43:27 -0500 From: Dwight Engen To: Kees Cook Cc: LKML , Brian Foster , Dave Chinner , Gao feng , Ben Myers , Greg KH Subject: Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable? Message-ID: <20131206094327.0b0e22ef@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Oracle Corporation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add > capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was > never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8 > by 8ca149de80478441352a8622ea15fae7de703ced ("xfs: add > XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl"). > > I don't see this in the 3.8.y tree. Should it be added there and > newer? I believe that would be appropriate, but would defer to Brian as the original author of the eofblocks change. > Thanks, > > -Kees >