From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757802Ab3LFR3h (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:29:37 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:50354 "EHLO mail-pd0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753792Ab3LFR3f (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:29:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:29:31 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: David Miller Cc: zwu.kernel@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/6] macvtap: remove the dead branch Message-ID: <20131206172931.GA32730@roeck-us.net> References: <1386282527-14094-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> <1386282527-14094-4-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> <52A169D4.4060209@roeck-us.net> <20131206.114602.2053541753179744731.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131206.114602.2053541753179744731.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:46:02AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Guenter Roeck > Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:08:20 -0800 > > > Assigning the function's return value to ret just to ignore it seems > > odd. > > > > Might make sense to change the function type to void. > > That's exactly what his very next patch does, undoubtedly the two > patches should be combined into one. > Yes, I think that would be a good idea. Thanks, Guenter