From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
roy.franz@linaro.org, msalter@redhat.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm: Add [U]EFI runtime services support
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:59:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201312061859.40224.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131206175449.GD24997@rocoto.smurfnet.nu>
On Friday 06 December 2013, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:59:48AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 November 2013, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > > @@ -898,6 +900,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > > sanity_check_meminfo();
> > > arm_memblock_init(&meminfo, mdesc);
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> > > + uefi_memblock_arm_reserve_range();
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> >
> > Better use
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI))
> >
> > here for readability and better build-time checking of the interface when
> > CONFIG_EFI is disabled.
>
> I think I'll do what Grant suggested and stub it out in asm/uefi.h.
That's ok, too. I usually prefer the IS_ENABLED() method if there is only
one caller, since it's harder to get wrong, but the result is similar.
> > > +/*
> > > + * Returns 1 if 'facility' is enabled, 0 otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +int efi_enabled(int facility)
> > > +{
> > > + return test_bit(facility, &arm_uefi_facility) != 0;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(efi_enabled);
> >
> > I'd use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() unless there is a documented reason why
> > a symbol should be available to GPL-incompatible modules.
>
> So ... this is duplicating x86 code which Matt Fleming has promised
> to make generic. I'd prefer to keep it identical to x86 until this
> copy goes away.
Ok, makes sense.
> > > +static int __init remap_region(efi_memory_desc_t *md, efi_memory_desc_t *entry)
> > > +{
> > > + u64 va;
> > > + u64 paddr;
> > > + u64 size;
> > > +
> > > + *entry = *md;
> > > + paddr = entry->phys_addr;
> > > + size = entry->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Map everything writeback-capable as coherent memory,
> > > + * anything else as device.
> > > + */
> > > + if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB)
> > > + va = (u64)((u32)uefi_remap(paddr, size) & 0xffffffffUL);
> > > + else
> > > + va = (u64)((u32)uefi_ioremap(paddr, size) & 0xffffffffUL);
> >
> > Same here. Why is 'va' a u64?
>
> Because the field in the structure (defined by UEFI) is 64-bit:
>
> entry->virt_addr = va;
I see. Maybe put the typecast in that final assignment then?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-06 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 16:41 [PATCH v3 0/3] (U)EFI runtime services for arm Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` < 1385656883-4420-2-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
[not found] ` < CAHCPf3t5dEzVWbYZ6DWcFCENNO2dbrx-YeZvKRk0MkEsJMTE3A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` < 20131202210719.GQ24997@rocoto.smurfnet.nu>
[not found] ` < CAHCPf3tsWdV+dJGm6mX6N4Ou5EQoGukdLyRvsRX6VQFjtKgxtg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` < 20131204224447.GA19265@srcf.ucam.org>
[not found] ` < CAHCPf3s_SXYXLRwvn7tzqTCQ-gB=emRMK_dXkEmw_HWigiD7Mw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` < 20131210123035.D1586C40A27@trevor.secretlab.ca>
[not found] ` < 20131129115319.GC11775@console-pimps.org>
2013-11-28 16:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Documentation: arm: add UEFI support documentation Leif Lindholm
2013-12-02 19:51 ` Matt Sealey
2013-12-02 21:07 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-12-04 21:06 ` Matt Sealey
2013-12-04 22:31 ` Mark Salter
2013-12-04 22:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-06 17:20 ` Matt Sealey
2013-12-10 12:30 ` Grant Likely
2013-12-10 18:29 ` Roy Franz
2013-12-10 22:42 ` Grant Likely
2013-12-05 11:08 ` Grant Likely
2013-12-05 12:58 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-12-05 10:55 ` Grant Likely
2013-12-05 11:16 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-28 16:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm: Add [U]EFI runtime services support Leif Lindholm
2013-11-29 16:10 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-29 17:43 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-12-06 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2013-12-05 11:59 ` Grant Likely
2013-12-06 1:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-06 17:54 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-12-06 17:59 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-11-28 16:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] init: efi: arm: enable (U)EFI runtime services on arm Leif Lindholm
2013-12-05 12:03 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-29 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] (U)EFI runtime services for arm Matt Fleming
2013-11-29 17:58 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-12-05 12:04 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201312061859.40224.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=roy.franz@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox