From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758973Ab3LGR4Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:56:24 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:64979 "EHLO mail-ea0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758759Ab3LGR4W (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:56:22 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:56:11 +0100 From: Richard Cochran To: John Stultz Cc: Miroslav Lichvar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Prarit Bhargava Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] timekeeping: Fix clock stability with nohz Message-ID: <20131207175610.GA7198@netboy> References: <1384440640-9482-1-git-send-email-mlichvar@redhat.com> <528A7C88.1030801@linaro.org> <20131120183900.GA25735@localhost> <529D2BA6.5020005@linaro.org> <529D5805.20903@linaro.org> <20131206142602.GH22878@localhost> <52A27D51.1040805@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52A27D51.1040805@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 05:43:45PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > Anyway, let me know what you think and I'll run some tests on it this > weekend. > > thanks > -john > > > diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > index 3abf534..bfb36fd 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > @@ -1056,42 +1056,24 @@ static __always_inline int > timekeeping_bigadjust(struct timekeeper *tk, > s64 *offset) John, Any chance of posting this against a normal kernel? I am preparing "real" tests comparing the three different patches in this thread on v3.12.3, but this one does not apply. Thanks, Richard