From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760912Ab3LIIgb (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 03:36:31 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48279 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754714Ab3LIIg3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 03:36:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:33:17 -0800 From: "'Greg Kroah-Hartman'" To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/39] USB: remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro Message-ID: <20131209083317.GA27716@kroah.com> References: <001501ceefb1$69c96820$3d5c3860$%han@samsung.com> <003401ceefb6$22c930e0$685b92a0$%han@samsung.com> <20131209040342.GA20608@saruman.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131209040342.GA20608@saruman.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 10:03:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:27:58AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > > Don't use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro, because this macro > > is not preferred. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han > > I wonder why I wasn't Cc:ed to this email considering it touches three > drivers I care about. > > Greg, I have the original ones in my tree and I would really like to > avoid rebasing my 'next' branch. Do we keep it there or do you want to > avoid merging those commits ? Just keep it there and we can handle the merge, it shouldn't be a big deal, right? thanks, greg k-h