From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752649Ab3LJJHN (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:07:13 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59438 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752300Ab3LJJHK (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:07:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:08:47 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Laxman Dewangan , Heiko Stuebner , ian.campbell@citrix.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, len.brown@intel.com, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 46/62] irq: Enable all irqs unconditionally in irq_resume Message-ID: <20131210090847.GA4600@kroah.com> References: <20131210080057.415644748@linuxfoundation.org> <20131210080100.654204750@linuxfoundation.org> <20131210090113.GA22756@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131210090113.GA22756@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:01:13AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > > me know. > > Objections... well... I'm not sure if it meets stable criteria. In > particular, I don't think it was ever demonstrated as having bad > effect on the users. Well, I'm guessing someone on the cc: here wanted it in stable@, so I'll let them speak up as to why...