From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jacob.w.shin@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
hpa@zytor.com, tgl@domain.invalid, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sherry.hurwitz@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:23:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131210152342.GE10633@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380730268-25807-2-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:11:06AM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com wrote:
> From: Jacob Shin <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>
>
> Implement hardware breakpoint address mask for AMD Family 16h and
> above processors. CPUID feature bit indicates hardware support for
> DRn_ADDR_MASK MSRs. These masks further qualify DRn/DR7 hardware
> breakpoint addresses to allow matching of larger addresses ranges.
>
> Valuable advice and pseudo code from Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Thinking further about this, Oleg convinced me that we can keep the mask eventually.
It actually makes sense internally just for the use of bpext.
But I still have a few comments on this patchset:
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/debugreg.h | 5 ++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/msr-index.h | 4 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 19 ++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 47 ++++++++++++++---------------------
> 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index d3f5c63..26609bb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT (6*32+22) /* topology extensions CPUID leafs */
> #define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE (6*32+23) /* core performance counter extensions */
> #define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_NB (6*32+24) /* NB performance counter extensions */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_BPEXT (6*32+26) /* data breakpoint extension */
Please comment that it's AMD specific.
> #define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_L2 (6*32+28) /* L2 performance counter extensions */
>
> /*
> @@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_power_flags[32];
> #define cpu_has_cx16 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX16)
> #define cpu_has_eager_fpu boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
> #define cpu_has_topoext boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
> +#define cpu_has_bpext boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BPEXT)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/debugreg.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/debugreg.h
> index 4b528a9..145b009 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/debugreg.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/debugreg.h
> @@ -114,5 +114,10 @@ static inline void debug_stack_usage_inc(void) { }
> static inline void debug_stack_usage_dec(void) { }
> #endif /* X86_64 */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD
> +extern void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr);
> +#else
> +static inline void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr) { }
> +#endif
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_DEBUGREG_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> index ef1c4d2..6c98be8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> */
> struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
> unsigned long address;
> + unsigned long mask;
> u8 len;
> u8 type;
> };
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/msr-index.h
> index bb04650..1f04f6c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,10 @@
> /* Fam 16h MSRs */
> #define MSR_F16H_L2I_PERF_CTL 0xc0010230
> #define MSR_F16H_L2I_PERF_CTR 0xc0010231
> +#define MSR_F16H_DR1_ADDR_MASK 0xc0011019
> +#define MSR_F16H_DR2_ADDR_MASK 0xc001101a
> +#define MSR_F16H_DR3_ADDR_MASK 0xc001101b
> +#define MSR_F16H_DR0_ADDR_MASK 0xc0011027
>
> /* Fam 15h MSRs */
> #define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL 0xc0010200
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index 903a264..fffc9cb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -909,3 +909,22 @@ static bool cpu_has_amd_erratum(struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpu, const int *erratum)
>
> return false;
> }
> +
> +void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr)
> +{
> + if (!cpu_has_bpext)
> + return;
> +
> + switch (dr) {
> + case 0:
> + wrmsr(MSR_F16H_DR0_ADDR_MASK, mask, 0);
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + case 2:
> + case 3:
> + wrmsr(MSR_F16H_DR1_ADDR_MASK - 1 + dr, mask, 0);
> + break;
> + default:
How about just:
if (dr <= 4 && dr >= 0)
wrmsr(MSR_F16H_DR1_ADDR_MASK + dr - 1, mask, 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index f66ff16..3cb1951 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
> *dr7 |= encode_dr7(i, info->len, info->type);
>
> set_debugreg(*dr7, 7);
> + if (info->mask)
> + set_dr_addr_mask(info->mask, i);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -163,29 +165,8 @@ void arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
> *dr7 &= ~__encode_dr7(i, info->len, info->type);
>
> set_debugreg(*dr7, 7);
> -}
> -
> -static int get_hbp_len(u8 hbp_len)
> -{
> - unsigned int len_in_bytes = 0;
> -
> - switch (hbp_len) {
> - case X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1:
> - len_in_bytes = 1;
> - break;
> - case X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2:
> - len_in_bytes = 2;
> - break;
> - case X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4:
> - len_in_bytes = 4;
> - break;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - case X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8:
> - len_in_bytes = 8;
> - break;
> -#endif
> - }
> - return len_in_bytes;
> + if (info->mask)
> + set_dr_addr_mask(0, i);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -198,7 +179,7 @@ int arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(struct perf_event *bp)
> struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
>
> va = info->address;
> - len = get_hbp_len(info->len);
> + len = bp->attr.bp_len;
So we can access the attr directly instead of get_hbp_len(). Good, that's a welcome
simplification but it's a change that is meaningful and tricky enough to deserve a seperate patch.
Could you send a seperate one for that?
>
> return (va >= TASK_SIZE) && ((va + len - 1) >= TASK_SIZE);
> }
> @@ -279,7 +260,16 @@ static int arch_build_bp_info(struct perf_event *bp)
> }
>
> /* Len */
> + info->mask = 0;
> +
> switch (bp->attr.bp_len) {
> + default:
> + if (!is_power_of_2(bp->attr.bp_len))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (!cpu_has_bpext)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + info->mask = bp->attr.bp_len - 1;
> + /* fall through */
So, that's perhaps just personal preference but having the default on
top of the switch makes things very confusing. Can't we put the above
in the end of the switch instead?
> case HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1:
> info->len = X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1;
> break;
> @@ -294,12 +284,11 @@ static int arch_build_bp_info(struct perf_event *bp)
> info->len = X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
> break;
> #endif
> - default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> /*
> * Validate the arch-specific HW Breakpoint register settings
> */
> @@ -314,11 +303,11 @@ int arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(struct perf_event *bp)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> -
> switch (info->len) {
> case X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1:
> align = 0;
> + if (info->mask)
> + align = info->mask;
Confused, I thought mask is set only when length is above 8?
> break;
> case X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2:
> align = 1;
> @@ -332,7 +321,7 @@ int arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(struct perf_event *bp)
> break;
> #endif
> default:
> - return ret;
> + BUG();
Please use WARN_ON_ONCE() instead.
Thanks.
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-10 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 16:11 [PATCH V5 0/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD Family 16h Data Breakpoint Extensions suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-10-02 16:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8 suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-10-31 9:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-31 10:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-31 11:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-02 4:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-08 21:22 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-11-08 14:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-31 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-08 19:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 15:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-09 15:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-11 15:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-11 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-02 23:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-04 13:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-10 14:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-10 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-10 15:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-12-10 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-10 16:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-11 12:05 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-10-02 16:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: allow user to specify hardware breakpoint bp_len suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-12-10 15:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-10 16:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-10 16:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-02 16:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf tools: add hardware breakpoint bp_len test cases suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-10-02 16:15 ` [PATCH V5 0/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD Family 16h Data Breakpoint Extensions Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-02 16:54 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-10-31 9:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-28 6:05 [PATCH V4 " Jacob Shin
2013-04-28 6:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8 Jacob Shin
2013-04-26 18:57 [PATCH 0/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD Family 16h Data Breakpoint Extensions Jacob Shin
2013-04-26 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8 Jacob Shin
2013-04-27 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 15:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 15:40 ` Jacob Shin
2013-04-27 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-28 6:05 ` Jacob Shin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131210152342.GE10633@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.w.shin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tgl@domain.invalid \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).