public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 3/5] lockdep: Correctly annotate hardirq context in irq_exit()
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:37:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131211003801.986511386@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20131211003732.351606520@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0003-lockdep-Correctly-annotate-hardirq-context-in-irq_ex.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4266 bytes --]

3.10.22-rt20-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

There was a reported deadlock on -rt which lockdep didn't report.

It turns out that in irq_exit() we tell lockdep that the hardirq
context ends and then do all kinds of locking afterwards.

To fix it, move trace_hardirq_exit() to the very end of irq_exit(), this
ensures all locking in tick_irq_exit() and rcu_irq_exit() are properly
recorded as happening from hardirq context.

This however leads to the 'fun' little problem of running softirqs
while in hardirq context. To cure this make the softirq code a little
more complex (in the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS case).

Due to stack swizzling arch dependent trickery we cannot pass an
argument to __do_softirq() to tell it if it was done from hardirq
context or not; so use a side-band argument.

When we do __do_softirq() from hardirq context, 'atomically' flip to
softirq context and back, so that no locking goes without being in
either hard- or soft-irq context.

I didn't find any new problems in mainline using this patch, but it
did show the -rt problem.

Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-dgwc5cdksbn0jk09vbmcc9sa@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 4cacbcd..541adf3 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -355,6 +355,44 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(local_bh_enable_ip);
 #define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME  msecs_to_jiffies(2)
 #define MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 10
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
+/*
+ * Convoluted means of passing __do_softirq() a message through the various
+ * architecture execute_on_stack() bits.
+ *
+ * When we run softirqs from irq_exit() and thus on the hardirq stack we need
+ * to keep the lockdep irq context tracking as tight as possible in order to
+ * not miss-qualify lock contexts and miss possible deadlocks.
+ */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, softirq_from_hardirq);
+
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_from_hardirq(void)
+{
+	this_cpu_write(softirq_from_hardirq, 1);
+}
+
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_start(void)
+{
+	if (this_cpu_read(softirq_from_hardirq))
+		trace_hardirq_exit();
+	lockdep_softirq_enter();
+}
+
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_end(void)
+{
+	lockdep_softirq_exit();
+	if (this_cpu_read(softirq_from_hardirq)) {
+		this_cpu_write(softirq_from_hardirq, 0);
+		trace_hardirq_enter();
+	}
+}
+
+#else
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_from_hardirq(void) { }
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_start(void) { }
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_end(void) { }
+#endif
+
 asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 {
 	__u32 pending;
@@ -375,7 +413,7 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 
 	__local_bh_disable((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0),
 			   SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
-	lockdep_softirq_enter();
+	lockdep_softirq_start();
 
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
 restart:
@@ -393,8 +431,7 @@ restart:
 		wakeup_softirqd();
 	}
 
-	lockdep_softirq_exit();
-
+	lockdep_softirq_end();
 	account_irq_exit_time(current);
 	__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
 	tsk_restore_flags(current, old_flags, PF_MEMALLOC);
@@ -700,6 +737,7 @@ static inline void invoke_softirq(void)
 {
 #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
 	if (!force_irqthreads) {
+		lockdep_softirq_from_hardirq();
 		/*
 		 * We can safely execute softirq on the current stack if
 		 * it is the irq stack, because it should be near empty
@@ -749,13 +787,13 @@ void irq_exit(void)
 #endif
 
 	account_irq_exit_time(current);
-	trace_hardirq_exit();
 	sub_preempt_count(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
 	if (!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())
 		invoke_softirq();
 
 	tick_irq_exit();
 	rcu_irq_exit();
+	trace_hardirq_exit(); /* must be last! */
 }
 
 void raise_softirq(unsigned int nr)
-- 
1.8.4.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-11  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-11  0:37 [PATCH RT 0/5] Linux 3.10.22-rt20-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11  0:37 ` [PATCH RT 1/5] cpu_down: move migrate_enable() back Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11  0:37 ` [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11 14:25   ` Corey Minyard
2013-12-11 15:34     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-15 15:28       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-12-15 21:08         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11 19:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-09  0:27     ` Ben Hutchings
2014-03-10 14:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-10 17:52         ` Ben Hutchings
2014-03-10 18:14           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-11  2:06             ` Ben Hutchings
2014-03-11  2:56               ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-11 15:54                 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-12 18:15                   ` Ben Hutchings
2013-12-11  0:37 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-12-11  0:37 ` [PATCH RT 4/5] rtmutex: use a trylock for waiter lock in trylock Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11  0:37 ` [PATCH RT 5/5] Linux 3.10.22-rt20-rc1 Steven Rostedt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-11  0:46 [PATCH RT 0/5] Linux 3.8.13.13-rt26-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11  0:46 ` [PATCH RT 3/5] lockdep: Correctly annotate hardirq context in irq_exit() Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11  0:50 [PATCH RT 0/5] Linux 3.4.72-rt90-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11  0:50 ` [PATCH RT 3/5] lockdep: Correctly annotate hardirq context in irq_exit() Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131211003801.986511386@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox