From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753337Ab3LMPsk (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:48:40 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:18178 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752719Ab3LMPsi (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:48:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:47:22 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, mukesh.rathor@oracle.com, tim@xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, Wei Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 05/14] xen/pvh: balloon and grant changes. Message-ID: <20131213154722.GA7214@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1386900621-27528-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <1386900621-27528-6-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <20131213143620.GH2923@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20131213145937.GB4770@phenom.dumpdata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > > These changes to balloon.c are similar to my patch but: > > > > > > > > > > - they don't prevent set_phys_to_machine from being called by > > > > > increase_reservation for auto_translated guests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - they don't prevent wasteful balloon_scratch_page from being allocated > > > > > for auto_translated guests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that it would be best to take my patch instead. > > > > > > > > Lets focus the review on your patch then and have it part of this > > > > series. > > > > > > OK, but keep in mind that Xen on ARMv8 is currently broken without that > > > patch. > > > > Hm. We could have another patch to just disable BALLOON on ARMv8 :-) > > > > The question you have to ask - if your patch causes regression are you > > OK tracking/fixing it over the holidays :-) If yes, then yes - we can > > put that in v3.13-rc3 to make it work properly on ARMv8. > > Damn, that was a good argument. > After thinking more about it, I think that I, or a member of my team, > can actually fix possible bugs during the holidays. Especially > considering that the patch doesn't alter the behavior of PV guests. > > So in short, yes :) Great ! Could you repost it with the description changes? Or if you OK with the changes I had proposed - just tell me "yes" and I will alter it.