From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753451Ab3LMUDh (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:03:37 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:52433 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753411Ab3LMUDg (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:03:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:03:03 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alex Shi Cc: mingo@redhat.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, pjt@google.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, james.hogan@imgtec.com, jason.low2@hp.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu_load decay Message-ID: <20131213200303.GI2480@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1386061556-28233-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1386061556-28233-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I had a quick peek at the actual patches. afaict we're now using weighted_cpuload() aka runnable_load_avg as the ->cpu_load. Whatever happened to also using the blocked_avg? I totally hate patch 4; it seems like a random hack to make up for the lack of blocked_avg.