From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: intel-mid: make X86_INTEL_MID depending on SFI
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:13:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131216101359.GB21304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387049004-21622-1-git-send-email-david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
* David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Despite our intention to not make Intel MID dependent of SFI, it does
> not reflect the current situation.
> If SFI is not selected, Intel MID can't select APB_TIMER otherwise this
> happens:
>
> arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `apbt_set_mapping':
> arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c:91: undefined reference to `sfi_get_mtmr'
> arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c:109: undefined reference to `sfi_free_mtmr'
> arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c:112: undefined reference to `sfi_get_mtmr'
> arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c:91: undefined reference to `sfi_get_mtmr'
> arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c:109: undefined reference to `sfi_free_mtmr'
> arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c:112: undefined reference to `sfi_get_mtmr'
>
> This patch solves such problem by adding SFI as dependence of
> X86_INTEL_MID. As soon as we make Intel MID completely independent of
> SFI this patch is safe to be reverted.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> This patch is intended to be applied on kernel 3.13-rc release.
>
> As a matter of curiosity, CONFIG_APB_TIMER does depend on CONFIG_SFI. But looks
> like CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID is able to bypass it.
> Maybe we need to check Kconfig itself too?
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 00fa3b7d2abe..5802476d4e91 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ config X86_INTEL_MID
> depends on PCI
> depends on PCI_GOANY
> depends on X86_IO_APIC
> + depends on SFI
> select DW_APB_TIMER
> select APB_TIMER
> select INTEL_SCU_IPC
Can SFI be selected instead? That's what CONFIG_X86_MDFLD does, and
it's a conceptual extension of 'select DW_APB_TIMER'.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-16 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-14 19:23 [PATCH] x86: intel-mid: make X86_INTEL_MID depending on SFI David Cohen
2013-12-16 10:13 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-12-16 18:07 ` David Cohen
2013-12-16 19:31 ` David Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131216101359.GB21304@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox