From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754886Ab3LPR1O (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:27:14 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f48.google.com ([209.85.160.48]:38746 "EHLO mail-pb0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754536Ab3LPR1M (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:27:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:27:10 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Laszlo Papp Cc: Marcus Folkesson , hjk@hansjkoch.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Add support for gpiodef Message-ID: <20131216172710.GA1811@roeck-us.net> References: <20131121173458.GC10783@roeck-us.net> <528F6BB8.8040504@roeck-us.net> <20131122160457.GA3951@roeck-us.net> <20131122180501.GA8547@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:56:33PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote: > So, Mr. Roeck, how do you suggest to handle input or output port > configuration? Should it be coming from platform data, or should it be > more dynamic? I would say, it is usually static, but I do not know if > it is common to be dynamic. I am not a hardware designer. > Platform and/or devicetree. Guenter