public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Fix rq's cpupri leak while enqueue/dequeue child RT entities
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:46:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131217124656.GI21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <122071387281778@web18h.yandex.ru>

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:02:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> 
> 
> 13.12.2013, 19:42, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:59:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >
> >>  This patch touches RT group scheduling case.
> >>
> >>  Functions inc_rt_prio_smp() and dec_rt_prio_smp() change (global) rq's priority,
> >>  while rt_rq passed to them may be not the top-level rt_rq. This is wrong, because
> >>  changing of priority on a child level does not guarantee that the priority is
> >>  the highest all over the rq. So, this leak makes RT balancing unusable.
> >>
> >>  The short example: the task having the highest priority among all rq's RT tasks
> >>  (no one other task has the same priority) are waking on a throttle rt_rq.
> >>  The rq's cpupri is set to the task's priority equivalent, but real
> >>  rq->rt.highest_prio.curr is less.
> >>
> >>  The patch below fixes the problem.
> >>
> >>  It looks like all version have this bug, so I CC'ed stable mailing list.
> >
> > Yeah, I think this is right.
> >
> > cpupri stuff should indeed only be changed for the top level group.
> 
> Ingo, are you going to apply this patch? Or will you give any comments?

I queued it, Ingo should get it through me somewhere today if all things
go well.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-17 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-27 15:59 [PATCH] sched/rt: Fix rq's cpupri leak while enqueue/dequeue child RT entities Kirill Tkhai
2013-12-12 10:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2013-12-13 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:02   ` Kirill Tkhai
2013-12-17 12:46     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-12-17 13:08       ` Kirill Tkhai
2013-12-18 10:32 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/rt: Fix rq's cpupri leak while enqueue/ dequeue " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131217124656.GI21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox