From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753539Ab3LQNcZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:32:25 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:43580 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753363Ab3LQNcY (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:32:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:32:04 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Eliezer Tamir Cc: Arjan van de Ven , lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, rui.zhang@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, Mike Galbraith , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Thomas Gleixner , John Stultz , Andy Lutomirski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] cleanups and optimizations Message-ID: <20131217133204.GK21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20131212140835.729222186@infradead.org> <52AAE61D.4060406@linux.intel.com> <20131213135626.GL21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <52AF3CF0.3090502@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52AF3CF0.3090502@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 07:48:32PM +0200, Eliezer Tamir wrote: > On 13/12/2013 15:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:49:01PM +0200, Eliezer Tamir wrote: > >> On 12/12/2013 16:08, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>> This series contains the preempt_enable_no_resched() cleanups that include > >>> spin_lock_bh() optimizations and local_clock() optimizations. > >> > >> I'm trying to test this on tip/master. > >> Patch 3 fails to apply on kenrel/softirq.c > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=preempt_clock > > > > Applied just fine here.. stuffed it in a git tree. > > Thanks, > That worked. > > My test is, netperf TCP_RR 1 byte, with busy polling enabled, 30s run. > > I see 92.0K RR with your patches, 91.8K RR with out them. > This is barely above the noise level, but I'm pretty sure it's real. > In any case I don't see any regression. Awesomeness.. you'll work on subtracting the spin time from the sleep time?