public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] nohz: Introduce full dynticks' default timekeeping target
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:54:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131217235418.GK19211@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387320692-28460-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:51:25PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When a full dynticks CPU wakes up while the whole rest of the system
> is idle, we need to wake up the CPU in charge of the timekeeping duty
> handling.
> 
> As of today, the CPU that maintains this duty is CPU 0 when
> CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y. So referring to tick_do_timer_cpu like we
> currently do is correct. But this behaviour is subject to change
> in the future because we want to balance the timekeeping duty over all
> the CPUs outside the full dynticks range.
> 
> As such we now need to define a default timekeeping CPU which receives
> the timekeeping wakeup IPIs and which can't be offlined so that it's
> guaranteed to always be present for full dynticks CPUs housekeeping.
> 
> So lets stick to CPU 0 for this purpose. It's convenient because
> rejecting any other CPU's offlining request may result in suspend
> failure.

OK, so not multiple CPUs yet.  Whew!

Well, at least you know some of my concerns with multiple timekeeping
CPUs beforehand, which would not have happened had I reviewed the
patches in order.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> We can optimize this solution later by adaptively sending the IPI
> to a potential timekeeping CPU that is already running a non idle task.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/tick.h     | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h |  4 ++--
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index cf2fd34..af98d2c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,22 @@ static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
>  }
> 
>  /**
> + * tick_timekeeping_default_cpu - seek timekeeping default CPU
> +
> + * @return the default target which we send an IPI to
> + * when a full dynticks CPU wakes up and exits from full
> + * system idle state.
> + *
> + * This target is always CPU 0 in full dynticks environment.
> + * If we were to pick up any other CPU, that would result in suspend
> + * failures due to rejected offlining request.
> + */
> +static inline int tick_timekeeping_default_cpu(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * tick_timeeping_cpu - check if a CPU is elligble to handle timekeeping duty
>   * @cpu:	the cpu to check
>   *
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 84d90c8..1795265 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2488,7 +2488,7 @@ void rcu_sysidle_force_exit(void)
>  				      oldstate, RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT);
>  		if (oldstate == newoldstate &&
>  		    oldstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED) {
> -			smp_send_reschedule(tick_do_timer_cpu);
> +			smp_send_reschedule(tick_timekeeping_default_cpu());
>  			return; /* We cleared it, done! */
>  		}
>  		oldstate = newoldstate;
> @@ -2597,7 +2597,7 @@ static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>   */
>  static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
>  {
> -	int cpu = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu);
> +	int cpu = tick_timekeeping_default_cpu();
> 
>  	if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>  		return;
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index ea0d411..9a91c31 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int tick_nohz_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
>  		 * If we handle the timekeeping duty for full dynticks CPUs,
>  		 * we can't safely shutdown that CPU.
>  		 */
> -		if (tick_nohz_full_running && tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
> +		if (tick_nohz_full_running && tick_timekeeping_default_cpu() == cpu)
>  			return NOTIFY_BAD;
>  		break;
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-17 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-17 22:51 [RFC PATCH 00/13] nohz: Use sysidle detection to let the timekeeper sleep Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 01/13] tick: Rename tick_check_idle() to tick_irq_enter() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-01-25 14:22   ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 02/13] time: New helper to check CPU eligibility to handle timekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 03/13] rcu: Exclude all potential timekeepers from sysidle detection Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:27   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 23:49     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 11:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 11:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 14:15         ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 16:24         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 04/13] tick: Use timekeeping_cpu() to elect the CPU handling timekeeping duty Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:55   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 05/13] rcu: Fix unraised IPI to timekeeping CPU Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:21   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:13     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 14:22       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:56         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 15:11           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 15:58             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 15:38     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 15:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-18 17:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 06/13] nohz: Introduce full dynticks' default timekeeping target Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:54   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 07/13] sched: Enable IPI reception on timekeeper under nohz full system Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:52   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:49     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 15:50       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 10:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 08/13] nohz: Get timekeeping max deferment outside jiffies_lock Frederic Weisbecker
2014-01-25 14:22   ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 09/13] nohz: Allow timekeeper's tick to stop when all full dynticks CPUs are idle Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:51   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:36     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 15:29       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 10/13] nohz: Hand over timekeeping duty on cpu offlining Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:40   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:19     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 12:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 16:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 11/13] nohz: Wake up timekeeper on exit from sysidle state Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:34   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 23:52     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 12/13] nohz: Allow all CPUs outside nohz_full range to do timekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:32   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 13/13] nohz_full: fix code style issue of tick_nohz_full_stop_tick Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18  2:04 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] nohz: Use sysidle detection to let the timekeeper sleep Alex Shi
2013-12-18 10:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 14:18     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 17:43   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 21:29     ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-12-18 21:49       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 21:53         ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-12-18 21:57           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 22:55             ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131217235418.GK19211@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox