From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] nohz: Introduce full dynticks' default timekeeping target
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:54:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131217235418.GK19211@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387320692-28460-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:51:25PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When a full dynticks CPU wakes up while the whole rest of the system
> is idle, we need to wake up the CPU in charge of the timekeeping duty
> handling.
>
> As of today, the CPU that maintains this duty is CPU 0 when
> CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y. So referring to tick_do_timer_cpu like we
> currently do is correct. But this behaviour is subject to change
> in the future because we want to balance the timekeeping duty over all
> the CPUs outside the full dynticks range.
>
> As such we now need to define a default timekeeping CPU which receives
> the timekeeping wakeup IPIs and which can't be offlined so that it's
> guaranteed to always be present for full dynticks CPUs housekeeping.
>
> So lets stick to CPU 0 for this purpose. It's convenient because
> rejecting any other CPU's offlining request may result in suspend
> failure.
OK, so not multiple CPUs yet. Whew!
Well, at least you know some of my concerns with multiple timekeeping
CPUs beforehand, which would not have happened had I reviewed the
patches in order. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> We can optimize this solution later by adaptively sending the IPI
> to a potential timekeeping CPU that is already running a non idle task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> ---
> include/linux/tick.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 4 ++--
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index cf2fd34..af98d2c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,22 @@ static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
> }
>
> /**
> + * tick_timekeeping_default_cpu - seek timekeeping default CPU
> +
> + * @return the default target which we send an IPI to
> + * when a full dynticks CPU wakes up and exits from full
> + * system idle state.
> + *
> + * This target is always CPU 0 in full dynticks environment.
> + * If we were to pick up any other CPU, that would result in suspend
> + * failures due to rejected offlining request.
> + */
> +static inline int tick_timekeeping_default_cpu(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * tick_timeeping_cpu - check if a CPU is elligble to handle timekeeping duty
> * @cpu: the cpu to check
> *
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 84d90c8..1795265 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2488,7 +2488,7 @@ void rcu_sysidle_force_exit(void)
> oldstate, RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT);
> if (oldstate == newoldstate &&
> oldstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED) {
> - smp_send_reschedule(tick_do_timer_cpu);
> + smp_send_reschedule(tick_timekeeping_default_cpu());
> return; /* We cleared it, done! */
> }
> oldstate = newoldstate;
> @@ -2597,7 +2597,7 @@ static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> */
> static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
> {
> - int cpu = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu);
> + int cpu = tick_timekeeping_default_cpu();
>
> if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> return;
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index ea0d411..9a91c31 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int tick_nohz_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> * If we handle the timekeeping duty for full dynticks CPUs,
> * we can't safely shutdown that CPU.
> */
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running && tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
> + if (tick_nohz_full_running && tick_timekeeping_default_cpu() == cpu)
> return NOTIFY_BAD;
> break;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-17 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-17 22:51 [RFC PATCH 00/13] nohz: Use sysidle detection to let the timekeeper sleep Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 01/13] tick: Rename tick_check_idle() to tick_irq_enter() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-01-25 14:22 ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 02/13] time: New helper to check CPU eligibility to handle timekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 03/13] rcu: Exclude all potential timekeepers from sysidle detection Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 23:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 14:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 16:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 04/13] tick: Use timekeeping_cpu() to elect the CPU handling timekeeping duty Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 05/13] rcu: Fix unraised IPI to timekeeping CPU Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 14:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 15:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 15:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 15:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-18 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 06/13] nohz: Introduce full dynticks' default timekeeping target Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 07/13] sched: Enable IPI reception on timekeeper under nohz full system Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 15:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 08/13] nohz: Get timekeeping max deferment outside jiffies_lock Frederic Weisbecker
2014-01-25 14:22 ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 09/13] nohz: Allow timekeeper's tick to stop when all full dynticks CPUs are idle Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 10/13] nohz: Hand over timekeeping duty on cpu offlining Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 14:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 16:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 11/13] nohz: Wake up timekeeper on exit from sysidle state Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 23:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 12/13] nohz: Allow all CPUs outside nohz_full range to do timekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-17 23:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH 13/13] nohz_full: fix code style issue of tick_nohz_full_stop_tick Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 2:04 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] nohz: Use sysidle detection to let the timekeeper sleep Alex Shi
2013-12-18 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 14:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 17:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-18 21:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-12-18 21:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 21:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-12-18 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 22:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131217235418.GK19211@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox