From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Vaughan Cao <vaughan.cao@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] async: fix insert entry in ascending list
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:25:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131218122545.GD4324@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387336523-13756-1-git-send-email-vaughan.cao@oracle.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:15:23AM +0800, Vaughan Cao wrote:
> I suppose there is a fault in the patch of https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/16/546.
> I know you made a new patch for latest kernel which don't move the entry
> between pending and running list that remove the code I mentioned, but our
> kernel is based on v3.8.13 that has the code.
>
> In my understanding, both pending and running list are sorted ascendingly by
> cookie value. To find the correct postion to insert the entry into running
> list, we traverse reversely to the head. When a node with a smaller cookie is
> found, we break out and add the new entry after it. But the origin code tries
> to find a larger cookie and insert itself before that node, it won't result in
> a sorted list in any direction...
Yeah, I should have used list_for_each_entry() there. LOL, I'm an
idiot.
> I don't know if my understanding about the async mechanism is right, so here
> to have a check with you. Thanks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaughan Cao <vaughan.cao@oracle.com>
> ---
> kernel/async.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/async.c b/kernel/async.c
> index 6f34904..596c5e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/async.c
> +++ b/kernel/async.c
> @@ -135,9 +135,9 @@ static void async_run_entry_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> /* 1) move self to the running queue, make sure it stays sorted */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&async_lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry_reverse(pos, &running->domain, list)
> - if (entry->cookie < pos->cookie)
> + if (entry->cookie > pos->cookie)
> break;
> - list_move_tail(&entry->list, &pos->list);
> + list_move(&entry->list, &pos->list);
Hmmm... sadly, upstream doesn't have the ability to backport this.
The relevant code path is gone and -stable doesn't backport patches
which aren't mainline first. The only way would be backporting
through distros, I guess. But, again, this problem shouldn't be
noticeable with modern userland and it has been broekn without anyone
noticing for long enough, so maybe we can just leave it alone?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 3:15 [PATCH] async: fix insert entry in ascending list Vaughan Cao
2013-12-18 12:25 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-12-18 15:34 ` Vaughan Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131218122545.GD4324@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vaughan.cao@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox