From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752193Ab3LRTqm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:46:42 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:57585 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853Ab3LRTqk (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:46:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:46:15 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Andi Kleen Cc: Linus Torvalds , Paul McKenney , Waiman Long , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Michel Lespinasse , Rik van Riel , Raghavendra K T , George Spelvin , Tim Chen , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , Scott J Norton Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] qrwlock: A queue read/write lock implementation Message-ID: <20131218194615.GG16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1385147087-26588-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1385147087-26588-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <20131217192128.GA15969@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <878uvilzka.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878uvilzka.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:38:29AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > (maybe it would be time to get rid of the patchable LOCK though?) With the argument that Intel simply doesn't ship UP chips anymore, with the exception of quark which should probably run custom UP kernels due to size constraints anyway?