From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
mukesh.rathor@oracle.com, jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 05/12] xen/pvh: Update E820 to work with PVH
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:30:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131218203037.GA9698@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312181813260.8667@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 06:25:15PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >
> > In xen_add_extra_mem() we can skip updating P2M as it's managed
> > by Xen. PVH maps the entire IO space, but only RAM pages need
> > to be repopulated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > index 2137c51..f93bca1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> > #include <xen/interface/memory.h>
> > #include <xen/interface/physdev.h>
> > #include <xen/features.h>
> > +#include "mmu.h"
> > #include "xen-ops.h"
> > #include "vdso.h"
> >
> > @@ -81,6 +82,9 @@ static void __init xen_add_extra_mem(u64 start, u64 size)
> >
> > memblock_reserve(start, size);
> >
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return;
> > +
> > xen_max_p2m_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start + size);
> > for (pfn = PFN_DOWN(start); pfn < xen_max_p2m_pfn; pfn++) {
> > unsigned long mfn = pfn_to_mfn(pfn);
> > @@ -103,6 +107,7 @@ static unsigned long __init xen_do_chunk(unsigned long start,
> > .domid = DOMID_SELF
> > };
> > unsigned long len = 0;
> > + int xlated_phys = xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap);
> > unsigned long pfn;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -116,7 +121,7 @@ static unsigned long __init xen_do_chunk(unsigned long start,
> > continue;
> > frame = mfn;
> > } else {
> > - if (mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY)
> > + if (!xlated_phys && mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY)
> > continue;
> > frame = pfn;
> > }
> > @@ -154,6 +159,13 @@ static unsigned long __init xen_do_chunk(unsigned long start,
> > static unsigned long __init xen_release_chunk(unsigned long start,
> > unsigned long end)
> > {
> > + /*
> > + * Xen already ballooned out the E820 non RAM regions for us
> > + * and set them up properly in EPT.
> > + */
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return end - start;
> > +
> > return xen_do_chunk(start, end, true);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -222,6 +234,9 @@ static void __init xen_set_identity_and_release_chunk(
> > * (except for the ISA region which must be 1:1 mapped) to
> > * release the refcounts (in Xen) on the original frames.
> > */
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + goto skip;
> > +
> > for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn <= max_pfn_mapped && pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> > pte_t pte = __pte_ma(0);
> >
> > @@ -231,7 +246,7 @@ static void __init xen_set_identity_and_release_chunk(
> > (void)HYPERVISOR_update_va_mapping(
> > (unsigned long)__va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), pte, 0);
> > }
> > -
> > +skip:
> > if (start_pfn < nr_pages)
> > *released += xen_release_chunk(
> > start_pfn, min(end_pfn, nr_pages));
>
> A goto? Really? What's wrong with an if?
Moves too much code.
> Also considering that you are turning xen_release_chunk into a nop, the
> only purpose of this function on PVH is to call set_phys_range_identity.
> Can't we just do that?
And set_phys_range_identity ends up just doing:
769 if (unlikely(xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap)))
770 return pfn_e - pfn_s;
So what we really could do (which is what Mukesh's patch had):
if (xen_feature(XENFEAT..) {
if (start_pfn < nr_pages)
*released += min(end_pfn, nr_pages) - start_pfn;
*identity += end_pfn - start_pfn;
}
in its own function. We could do that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-17 20:51 [PATCH v11] PVH support for Linux kernel Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 01/12] xen/p2m: Check for auto-xlat when doing mfn_to_local_pfn Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 14:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 02/12] xen/pvh: Define what an PVH guest is Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 14:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 14:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 16:01 ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-18 16:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 17:03 ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-18 14:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 03/12] xen/pvh: Early bootup changes in PV code Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 14:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 14:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 15:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 04/12] xen/pvh: Don't setup P2M tree Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 14:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 05/12] xen/pvh: Update E820 to work with PVH Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 18:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 20:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-12-18 23:44 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-12-19 11:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 06/12] xen/pvh: Load GDT/GS in early PV bootup code for BSP Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 07/12] xen/pvh: Secondary VCPU bringup (non-bootup CPUs) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 08/12] xen/pvh: MMU changes for PVH Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 14:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 15:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 15:15 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 09/12] xen/pvh: Piggyback on PVHVM XenBus and event channels " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 18:31 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 21:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-01-04 0:48 ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-01-05 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-31 18:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-01-03 15:04 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-04 0:29 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 10/12] xen/pvh: Piggyback on PVHVM for grant driver Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 18:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 21:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-01-03 15:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 11/12] xen/pvh: Disable PV code that does not work with PVH Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 14:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 14:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 15:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-17 20:51 ` [PATCH v11 12/12] xen/pvh: Support ParaVirtualized Hardware extensions Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-18 14:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131218203037.GA9698@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox