From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751537Ab3LRUuV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:50:21 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35193 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751242Ab3LRUuU (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:50:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:50:15 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , LKML , Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] Use lockless lists for smp_call_function_single() Message-ID: <20131218205015.GA13685@quack.suse.cz> References: <1387387418-10005-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1387387418-10005-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 18-12-13 18:23:32, Jan Kara wrote: > Hello, > > these three patches make smp_call_function_single() use lockless lists and > cleanup abuse of csd.list in the block layer. I have some use for lockless > smp_call_function_single() in printk code and that's why I've picked up > Christoph's patch. Jens, can you have a look at the series please? > > Changes since v1: > * Reordered patches to a more sensible order. Bah, I screwed up. I had both new and older version of the patches in the directory for sending. Since it is just three patches, I'll just mark correct patches by email but if that is a problem I can resend as well. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR