From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756529Ab3LSMzI (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:55:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:40694 "EHLO mail-ee0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756459Ab3LSMzE (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:55:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:54:59 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dvhart@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, efault@gmx.de, jeffm@suse.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, scott.norton@hp.com, tom.vaden@hp.com, aswin@hp.com, Waiman.Long@hp.com, jason.low2@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] futex: Wakeup optimizations Message-ID: <20131219125459.GB18527@gmail.com> References: <1386063927-6545-1-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com> <1387380741.2797.27.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1387380741.2797.27.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > ping? > > If no one has any objections, could this patchset be picked up? There were a couple of review comments that I don't see fully addressed, one of them involving the messy looking SOB chain, so a new version needs to be sent in any case. Thanks, Ingo