From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf report: Use pr_*() functions if possible
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:30:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131219133047.GK4819@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387436411-20160-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Em Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:00:06PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
>
> There're some places printing a message to stdout/err directly. It
> should be converted to use proper error printing functions instead.
>
> If it's not possible, just do it when --stdio was enabled only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> index 3a14dbed387c..a1f72b471a96 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> @@ -321,8 +321,8 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
> int ret;
>
> if (perf_event__preprocess_sample(event, machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
> - event->header.type);
> + pr_debug("problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
> + event->header.type);
> return -1;
> }
>
> @@ -552,15 +552,17 @@ static int __cmd_report(struct perf_report *rep)
> desc);
> }
>
> - if (verbose > 3)
> - perf_session__fprintf(session, stdout);
> + if (use_browser == 0) {
> + if (verbose > 3)
> + perf_session__fprintf(session, stdout);
>
> - if (verbose > 2)
> - perf_session__fprintf_dsos(session, stdout);
> + if (verbose > 2)
> + perf_session__fprintf_dsos(session, stdout);
>
> - if (dump_trace) {
> - perf_session__fprintf_nr_events(session, stdout);
> - return 0;
> + if (dump_trace) {
> + perf_session__fprintf_nr_events(session, stdout);
> + return 0;
> + }
> }
This should be in a different patch, one that is related just to
dump_trace, i.e. if -D, aka dump_trace (right?) is enabled, then
probably we won't be initializing the TUI/GUI, no?
So having a patch that deals just with conversions of fprintf ->
pr_{err,etc} and another that deals with dump_trace related seems to be
the best course of action.
- Arnaldo
> nr_samples = 0;
> @@ -720,7 +722,7 @@ parse_callchain_opt(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
> return -1;
> setup:
> if (callchain_register_param(&callchain_param) < 0) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "Can't register callchain params\n");
> + pr_err("Can't register callchain params\n");
> return -1;
> }
> return 0;
> @@ -942,7 +944,7 @@ repeat:
> }
> if (report.mem_mode) {
> if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "branch and mem mode incompatible\n");
> + pr_err("branch and mem mode incompatible\n");
> goto error;
> }
> sort__mode = SORT_MODE__MEMORY;
> --
> 1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-19 7:00 [PATCHSET 0/6] perf tools: A couple of TUI improvements Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 7:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf report: Use pr_*() functions if possible Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2013-12-20 1:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-12-20 1:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 7:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf tools: Introduce struct perf_log Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-20 1:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 7:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Get rid of a duplicate va_end() Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-12-19 13:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-01-12 18:32 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Get rid of a duplicate va_end() in error reporting routine tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 7:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf tools: Save message when pr_*() was called Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 7:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf ui/tui: Implement log window Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 7:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf ui/tui: Implement header window Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 12:14 ` [PATCHSET 0/6] perf tools: A couple of TUI improvements Ingo Molnar
2013-12-20 1:20 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-19 13:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-12-19 15:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-19 15:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-20 1:21 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131219133047.GK4819@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox