From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753740Ab3LSRt2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:49:28 -0500 Received: from zabrina.hetzner-de.towertech.it ([178.63.16.19]:42001 "EHLO zabrina.hetzner-de.towertech.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751035Ab3LSRt1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:49:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:49:24 +0100 From: Alessandro Zummo To: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard) Cc: Jason Cooper , Mark Rutland , Stephen Rothwell , Ian Campbell , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Pawel Moll , Linus Walleij , Stephen Warren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Jason Gunthorpe , Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Landley , Kumar Gala , Grant Likely , Peter Huewe , Andrew Morton , Thierry Reding , Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem? Message-ID: <20131219184924.13a12247@linux.lan.towertech.it> In-Reply-To: <87sitoka39.fsf@natisbad.org> References: <87siton6ke.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131219164624.GV2609@titan.lakedaemon.net> <87sitoka39.fsf@natisbad.org> Organization: Tower Technologies Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:46:18 +0100 arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard) wrote: > > I don't mind routing it though mvebu/arm-soc since the only consumers > > are currently mvebu boards, but I'd like to hear from Andrew that this > > is ok. > > I will do what you think is the best. If the only consumers are mvebu boards, I believe it is correct to route though that tree. imho. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it