From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755875Ab3LSTxF (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:53:05 -0500 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:22333 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755154Ab3LSTxC (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:53:02 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 108.39.110.144 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX193Z3dELCGOZWA/pWi9WY1w9jTFeW6RmG4= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan 102144F76EB Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:52:32 -0500 From: Jason Cooper To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Arnaud Ebalard , Alessandro Zummo , Mark Rutland , Stephen Rothwell , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Linus Walleij , Ian Campbell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Jason Gunthorpe , Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Landley , Kumar Gala , Grant Likely , Peter Huewe , Andrew Morton , Thierry Reding Subject: Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem? Message-ID: <20131219195232.GZ2609@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <87siton6ke.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131219173857.0a546b99@linux.lan.towertech.it> <87d2kslphr.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131219184024.2a649328@linux.lan.towertech.it> <8761qkk96q.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131219180940.GY2609@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20131219194837.GA27311@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131219194837.GA27311@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:48:37AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:09:40PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Alessandro Zummo writes: > > > > > > >> Do you want me to send a v7 w/ the .proc helper removed or leave > > > >> things as they are and Ack the patch as is? > > > > > > > > Unless absolutely needed, I'd prefer if you can remove them > > > > or move to sysfs. > > > > > > Well, my helper provides info on control and status registers flags > > > (just like rtc-isl1208.c does), which are useful mainly for debug I > > > guess. If this can help pushing things forward, I will send a v7 later > > > today w/ the .proc helper removed from the patch. > > > > Why not convert to debugfs? > > > Separate follow-on patch, maybe, to keep things going ? Sure. thx, Jason.