From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Broken initrd compression settings in 3.13
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:33:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220213321.32d59343@corrin.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwwXKAs0dyJJ2FAcJj-okqqLYQsPsSask1p_nXvyrtWXw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:15:29 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:41:43 -0800 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> (a) most sane people don't even have lz4 _installed_, so dracut won't
> >> actually succeed
> >>
> >> (b) there's no way to select the compression level (unlike the
> >> INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION thing that actually has a choice)
> >>
> >> (c) even if you *do* have lz4, it doesn't actually work, because
> >> while that causes the new F20 dracut to compress the initramfs with
> >> lz4, the end result is completely broken, because the F20 "lsinitrd"
> >> scripts don't understand the end result, so now the whole kernel
> >> install fails.
> >>
> >> (a) and (b) are very much kernel bugs.
> >
> > Jeff sent the below this morning. Will that fix (a)?
>
> Yes, it fixes (a), at least to some degree, in that at least
> defaulting to bzip2 is a lot more sane than defaulting to lz4. I
> suspect most everybody has bzip2 installed. And at least on my current
> F20 install, it looks like lsinitrd understands to use zcat, bzcat or
> xzcat on the resulting initrd image (and bzcat does that bzip2
> decoding).
>
> So I think Jeff's patch at least fixes the symptoms.
>
> That said, I think it does nothing *but* fix the symptoms, and we're
> actually still better off with the 3.12 behavior which was to never
> set INITRD_COMPRESS at all. Because quite frankly, there's currently
> no way for the kernel to know what the right compressor is. bz2 may
> well work, but can you guarantee it? I certainly can't..
>
> Now, if we asked the user, that would be a different thing. But right
> now we very much don't ask the user, and we just pick one at random.
>
> We're better off not picking a compression method at all, at which
> point the distro "installkernel" will do whatever the distro does.
>
> Linus
Perhaps a better solution for this would be to instead export an
env var with a list of the compression algorithms that the kernel
supports. Then installkernel or dracut could use that info to make a
semi-intelligent decision based on that and what tools are installed.
...or maybe a separate env var for each one that it supports:
$INITRD_COMPRESS_LZ4
$INITRD_COMPRESS_BZIP2
$INITRD_COMPRESS_GZIP
...etc.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-21 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-21 0:41 Broken initrd compression settings in 3.13 Linus Torvalds
2013-12-21 1:39 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-21 2:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-12-21 2:23 ` Jeff Layton
2013-12-21 3:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-12-21 2:33 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2013-12-21 2:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-12-23 14:38 ` P J P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131220213321.32d59343@corrin.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox