Re: [PATCH] closures: move to lib/

Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-19T12:19:38Z

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:18:30AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> That's not really the kind of technical objection one can respond to. If
> you think there's a better way of doing this kind of asynchronous stuff,
> or a better mechanism already in the kernel (ha!) - please, by all
> means, enlighten us.

Show the actual use, and it shouldn't be hard to find something better.