From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][TRIVIAL] x86/smpboot: fix cpu bootup message
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:35:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131224103558.GA5520@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B8DEAE.2040100@huawei.com>
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 09:09:02AM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> On 2013/12/23 21:34, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 04:33:00PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> >> When CPU0 and CPU1 aren't in same package, we got message
> >> like this:
> >>
>
> [...]
>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> >> index 85dc05a..9e82c1e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> >> @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ static void announce_cpu(int cpu, int apicid)
> >> {
> >> static int current_node = -1;
> >> int node = early_cpu_to_node(cpu);
> >> - static int width, node_width;
> >> + static int width, node_width, padding;
> >>
> >> if (!width)
> >> width = num_digits(num_possible_cpus()) + 1; /* + '#' sign */
> >> @@ -658,11 +658,13 @@ static void announce_cpu(int cpu, int apicid)
> >>
> >> printk(KERN_INFO ".... node %*s#%d, CPUs: ",
> >> node_width - num_digits(node), " ", node);
> >> - }
> >>
> >> - /* Add padding for the BSP */
> >> - if (cpu == 1)
> >> - pr_cont("%*s", width + 1, " ");
> >> + /* Add padding for the BSP */
> >> + if (!padding && (early_cpu_to_node(0) == current_node)) {
> >
> > You don't need "padding".
> >
>
> On another machine, the configuration is:
>
> xiexiuqi@localhost:~> lscpu
> [...]
> NUMA node0 CPU(s): 4-7,12-15
> NUMA node1 CPU(s): 0-3,8-11
>
> Without "padding", we'll get message like this:
>
> [ 0.349339] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> [ 0.353504] .... node #1, CPUs: #1 #2 #3
> [ 0.398812] .... node #0, CPUs: #4 #5 #6 #7
> [ 0.535186] .... node #1, CPUs: #8 #9 #10 #11
> [ 0.594312] .... node #0, CPUs: #12 #13 #14 #15
> [ 0.652398] x86: Booted up 2 nodes, 16 CPUs
Geez, is that box generating the cores to nodes groups at random during
each boot?!
Gotta admire bios dudes' "inventiveness".
Ok, so Ingo, I guess we can take this -v2 version for now - I need to
think of a way on how to address all that nonsense properly.
Acked-by: Borislav "luvz BIOS people" Petkov <bp@suse.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-24 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-23 8:33 [PATCH v2][TRIVIAL] x86/smpboot: fix cpu bootup message Xie XiuQi
2013-12-23 13:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-12-24 1:09 ` Xie XiuQi
2013-12-24 1:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-12-24 3:52 ` Xie XiuQi
2013-12-24 6:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-12-24 10:35 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-12-24 18:30 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131224103558.GA5520@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox