public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: rui wang <ruiv.wang@gmail.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	X86-ML <x86@kernel.org>, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>,
	Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	janet.morgan@intel.com, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for number of available vectors before CPU down [v2]
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:44:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131230074434.GA20484@gchen.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52BF060E.7090905@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2002 bytes --]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:10:38PM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Gong and Rui,
> 
> After looking at this in detail I realized I made a mistake in my patch by
> including the check for the smp_affinity.  Simply put, it shouldn't be there
> given Rui's explanation above.
> 
> So I think the patch simply needs to do:
> 
>         this_count = 0;
>         for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
>                 irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
>                 if (irq >= 0) {
>                         desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>                         data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
>                         affinity = data->affinity;
>                         if (irq_has_action(irq) && !irqd_is_per_cpu(data))
>                                 this_count++;
>                 }
>         }
> 
> Can the two of you confirm the above is correct?  It would be greatly appreciated.
> 

No, I don't think it is correct. We still need to consider smp_affinity.

fixup_irqs
        irq_set_affinity(native_ioapic_set_affinity)
                __ioapic_set_affinity
                        assign_irq_vector
                                __assign_irq_vector
                        cpu_mask_to_apicid_and
                /* now begin to set ioapic RET */

__assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
...
        apic->vector_allocation_domain(cpu, tmp_mask, mask);
...
        for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, tmp_mask, cpu_online_mask)
                per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] = irq;
        cfg->vector = vector;
        cpumask_copy(cfg->domain, tmp_mask);
...
}

On same vecotr on all related vector_irq, irq is set. So such kind of
irq should happen in multiple vector_irq. In cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(e.g.
x2apic_cpu_mask_to_apicid_and for cluster mode), apic is updated
depending on new mask. That's why I think this kind of interrupt
should be bypassed.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-30  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-18 19:29 [PATCH] x86: Add check for number of available vectors before CPU down [v2] Prarit Bhargava
2013-12-18 19:50 ` Tony Luck
2013-12-19 18:05   ` Tony Luck
2013-12-19 18:11     ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-12-20  7:18       ` Chen, Gong
2013-12-20  9:41       ` rui wang
2013-12-20 10:49         ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-12-28 17:10         ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-12-30  7:44           ` Chen, Gong [this message]
2013-12-30 15:09             ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-12-30 12:56           ` rui wang
2013-12-30 15:08             ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-12-31  2:58               ` rui wang
2013-12-31 21:22                 ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-01-02  2:41                   ` Chen, Gong
2014-01-02 12:57                     ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-01-02 16:04                       ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-12-30 17:22             ` Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131230074434.GA20484@gchen.bj.intel.com \
    --to=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=janet.morgan@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=ruiv.wang@gmail.com \
    --cc=seiji.aguchi@hds.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox