From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756022Ab3L3O50 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:57:26 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:43557 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755870Ab3L3O5Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:57:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 07:57:21 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Li Wang Cc: Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Cong Wang , Zefan Li Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fadvise: Directory level page cache cleaning support Message-ID: <20131230145720.GB20793@parisc-linux.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 09:45:15PM +0800, Li Wang wrote: > VFS relies on LRU-like page cache eviction algorithm Why is this a series of three patches? It just seems like you're trying to game the patch count statistics. One patch would have been fine for this tiny change. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."