From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752354AbaACOfI (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:35:08 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:52413 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751820AbaACOfG (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:35:06 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] ARM: spear: Remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED flag Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:34:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, olof@lixom.net, khilman@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, Michael Opdenacker References: <1388419771-30075-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <201401021929.46581.arnd@arndb.de> <52C5B52E.6080609@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <52C5B52E.6080609@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401031534.37533.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:J0LLZ8ezz1HuyW+POrTOfMakWL3fUo5GITDf/fe6zw3 tGgELNdo02pA8plSlibm02QFkPELP6cqPFgtLekhL+mcUAHyga aQbHXfEvkKJYHFLmzYW9aa82bQAF1IZvaXDch4o1khBMY1nzXS p0TbMaj9X4ncb4aSTj9bdXWpLmxJpLxcZRZ18lmpkjNvc1vCn7 jCvZvY4wROhyTdntkDwpZlgI171bhFuIFY0FIombIBhS7hw83n mgp6Ie8XU8Fd5I+23NZi4l9oV5XnEWnxM4ujttReBNzR61XZDY q8juN6fpU4DVSvPJWeotjRYeRM5c/QFpivzbk35uoXj+GmfkTl asePrNXQFBwHMGJY0Vok= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 02 January 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 01/02/2014 07:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 30 December 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> This flag is a NOOP and scheduled to be removed > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > > > > Thanks for sending this series. I think the patches are duplicates of stuff that > > Michael Opdenacker has sent before (actually multiple times). I have no problem > > applying either version into arm-soc, but I think it would be better to attribute > > them to Michael, since he came first. Can you two please coordinate and send a > > single pull request for the arm-soc related patches that haven't made it into > > linux-next yet? > > Michael removed the flag for: > > pxa (ed7936f913456e4c01aed75deba6cfaf830fa8cf) > samsung (fa53d5cdbffbce421c3bd2f937b5626fc044fedc) > avr32 (7155530d9eb692994d208836e4965da06b17c99d) > ep93xx (3a71ae4796fdaedbdbdab94660b7b7b5bfe61d1d) > plat-orion (eb4d552b933ac59c0c8e0604ff435c5208a82679) > > The patchset I sent is on top of arm/for-next and finishes to remove > this flag for arch/arm. It should not overlap with what Michael did. > > I'm ok to attribute the patchset to Michael if that can help to accept > this patchset and kill this flag for arch/arm. IIRC, Michael actually sent patches for all uses in the entire kernel previously, but relied on sub-maintainers to pick them up one by one. Some patches already got 'Acked-by' replies, which I'd like to keep. It's probably time to do a bigger sweeping change now and kill it for good, bypassing the remaining maintainers that haven't acted so far. We can certainly carry the patches related to arm-soc, and I think it's worth trying once more to get the scsi patches merged, since there is a bunch of them. Everything else can probably go directly as a single pull-request to Linus, or perhaps via Andrew Morton. Arnd