From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/28] drm/i2c: tda998x: move the TBG_CNTRL_0 register setting
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:31:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140112123159.GS15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140112132321.757f3fa7@armhf>
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 01:23:21PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 18:36:48 +0000
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:06:07PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > > According to the comment, the TBG_CNTRL_0 register must be set at the
> > > end of the mode change sequence.
> >
> > So you believe comments without understanding the history, and you move
> > code around due to those.
> >
> > No, this is again wrong. That write to REG_TBG_CNTRL_0 in the sequence
> > writing the video information to the chip. This doesn't encompass the
> > HDMI/DVI mode setting nor the audio configuration - the audio configuration
> > can change independently of the video setting, and does not require this
> > register to be written.
> >
> > This also brings up a bug in one of your previous patches which I now
> > must go back and comment upon.
>
> Well, I have not the full spec of the TDA998x's, and I don't know what
> is important or not. I was hoping that Rob had a better knowledge than I.
>
> So, in my patch 9, I was writing the REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 after writing
> REG_TBG_CNTRL_0, and you refused it. Here, I write REG_TBG_CNTRL_0
> after the write of REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 in the HDMI sequence, and you still
> don't agree.
>
> What is the right way?
No, both NAKS are for the exact same issue.
Patch 9 inserted the write to REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 after REG_TBG_CNTRL_0.
Then in this patch you move REG_TBG_CNTRL_0 after all writes.
Had you appropriately placed the write to REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 in patch 9
in the first place, _this_ patch (patch 20) would not be required to
then move REG_TBG_CNTRL_0 after it. So, fixing patch 9 removes the
need for patch 20.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-12 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-09 11:06 [PATCH v2 20/28] drm/i2c: tda998x: move the TBG_CNTRL_0 register setting Jean-Francois Moine
2014-01-11 18:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-12 12:23 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-01-12 12:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-01-12 13:20 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2014-01-12 13:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140112123159.GS15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moinejf@free.fr \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox