public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 3/8] lockdep: Correctly annotate hardirq context in irq_exit()
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:58:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140116020324.318895929@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140116015824.201732155@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0003-lockdep-Correctly-annotate-hardirq-context-in-irq_ex.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4289 bytes --]

3.2.53-rt76-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

There was a reported deadlock on -rt which lockdep didn't report.

It turns out that in irq_exit() we tell lockdep that the hardirq
context ends and then do all kinds of locking afterwards.

To fix it, move trace_hardirq_exit() to the very end of irq_exit(), this
ensures all locking in tick_irq_exit() and rcu_irq_exit() are properly
recorded as happening from hardirq context.

This however leads to the 'fun' little problem of running softirqs
while in hardirq context. To cure this make the softirq code a little
more complex (in the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS case).

Due to stack swizzling arch dependent trickery we cannot pass an
argument to __do_softirq() to tell it if it was done from hardirq
context or not; so use a side-band argument.

When we do __do_softirq() from hardirq context, 'atomically' flip to
softirq context and back, so that no locking goes without being in
either hard- or soft-irq context.

I didn't find any new problems in mainline using this patch, but it
did show the -rt problem.

Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-dgwc5cdksbn0jk09vbmcc9sa@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index ca00a68..b261fad 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -297,6 +297,44 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(local_bh_enable_ip);
  */
 #define MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 10
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
+/*
+ * Convoluted means of passing __do_softirq() a message through the various
+ * architecture execute_on_stack() bits.
+ *
+ * When we run softirqs from irq_exit() and thus on the hardirq stack we need
+ * to keep the lockdep irq context tracking as tight as possible in order to
+ * not miss-qualify lock contexts and miss possible deadlocks.
+ */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, softirq_from_hardirq);
+
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_from_hardirq(void)
+{
+	this_cpu_write(softirq_from_hardirq, 1);
+}
+
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_start(void)
+{
+	if (this_cpu_read(softirq_from_hardirq))
+		trace_hardirq_exit();
+	lockdep_softirq_enter();
+}
+
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_end(void)
+{
+	lockdep_softirq_exit();
+	if (this_cpu_read(softirq_from_hardirq)) {
+		this_cpu_write(softirq_from_hardirq, 0);
+		trace_hardirq_enter();
+	}
+}
+
+#else
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_from_hardirq(void) { }
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_start(void) { }
+static inline void lockdep_softirq_end(void) { }
+#endif
+
 asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 {
 	__u32 pending;
@@ -308,7 +346,7 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 
 	__local_bh_disable((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0),
 			   SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
-	lockdep_softirq_enter();
+	lockdep_softirq_start();
 
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
 restart:
@@ -324,7 +362,7 @@ restart:
 	if (pending)
 		wakeup_softirqd();
 
-	lockdep_softirq_exit();
+	lockdep_softirq_end();
 
 	account_system_vtime(current);
 	__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
@@ -583,6 +621,7 @@ static inline void invoke_softirq(void)
 {
 #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
 	if (!force_irqthreads)
+		lockdep_softirq_from_hardirq();
 		__do_softirq();
 	else {
 		__local_bh_disable((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0),
@@ -618,7 +657,6 @@ static inline void invoke_softirq(void)
 void irq_exit(void)
 {
 	account_system_vtime(current);
-	trace_hardirq_exit();
 	sub_preempt_count(IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET);
 	if (!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())
 		invoke_softirq();
@@ -629,6 +667,7 @@ void irq_exit(void)
 	if (idle_cpu(smp_processor_id()) && !in_interrupt() && !need_resched())
 		tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(0);
 #endif
+	trace_hardirq_exit(); /* must be last! */
 	__preempt_enable_no_resched();
 }
 
-- 
1.8.4.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-16  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16  1:58 [PATCH RT 0/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  1:58 ` [PATCH RT 1/8] cpu_down: move migrate_enable() back Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  1:58 ` [PATCH RT 2/8] swait: Add a few more users Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  1:58 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-01-16  1:58 ` [PATCH RT 4/8] rtmutex: use a trylock for waiter lock in trylock Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  3:08   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-17  4:22     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-17  5:17       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-31 22:07         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-02-01  4:21           ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-01  4:54             ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-16  1:58 ` [PATCH RT 5/8] smp: introduce a generic on_each_cpu_mask() function Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  1:58 ` [PATCH RT 6/8] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameter func Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  1:58 ` [PATCH RT 7/8] fs: only send IPI to invalidate LRU BH when needed Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  1:58 ` [PATCH RT 8/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  9:41 ` [PATCH RT 0/8] " Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 14:18   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 14:36     ` Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 15:09       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 16:08       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 17:19         ` Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 16:18       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140116020324.318895929@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox