From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751467AbaAQFKK (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:10:10 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33162 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751064AbaAQFKF (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:10:05 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:12:14 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Clark Williams Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] preempt: Debug for possible missed preemption checks Message-Id: <20140116211214.581197e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20140116235751.084728c8@gandalf.local.home> References: <20140116235751.084728c8@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:57:51 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > When PROVE_LOCKING and PREEMPT is configured, the preempt state > tracking is active. Testing this out, I added a module that did the > following: So I assume your kernel at least has no instances of this bug, so we don't need the patch ;) It *is* a fairly daft thing to do. Maybe stick it in -next for a few months, see if anyone hits it?